Dismissed¶25

Kamaraj v. R.Kannan

Madras HC15 Dec 2025WMP(MD)/19832/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Leave to file review petition refused to strangers to the writ petition; WMP(MD).No.19832 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.(MD).Sr.No.76782 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Madras, order dated 15.12.2025 by M.S. Ramesh J. (bench with A.D. Maria Clete J.). Underlying order dated 29.01.2025 in WP.(MD).No.2408 of 2025 directed authorities to consider the writ petitioner's representation on merits with opportunity to interested persons. Petitioners: Kamaraj, K. Sathikbatcha, R. Durga (counsel E. Mareeskumar); respondents included R. Kannan, District Collector Thanjavur, Kumbakonam Corporation, HR&CE Assistant Commissioner and DSP Kumbakonam. Result: WMP dismissed; REV.APLW(MD)SR.No.76782/2025 rejected.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are neither parties to the Writ Petition nor are they affected by the orders passed in the Writ Petition.

Kamaraj Vs R.Kannan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WMP(MD).No.19832 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

WMP(MD).No.19832 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.(MD).Sr.No.76782 of 2025

¶7

1.Kamaraj 2.K.Sathikbatcha 3.R.Durga

...Petitioners

1.R.Kannan

2.The District Collector/Monitoring Committee, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur

¶12

3.The Commissioner, Kumbakonam Corporation, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District

¶13

4.The Assistant Commissioner, The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District

¶14

5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WMP(MD).No.19832 of 2025

¶19

For Petitioners : Mr.E.Mareeskumar

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by the M.S.Ramesh J. )

¶22

This Writ Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to grant leave to

¶23

the petitioners herein to file a Review Petition seeking to review the order dated 29.01.2025 made in WP.(MD).No.2408 of 2025.

¶24

The petitioners herein are neither parties to the Writ Petition nor

¶25

are they affected by the orders passed in the Writ Petition, which only directs the Authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner therein, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner therein, as well as all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter. Hence, this petition seeking leave to file a Review Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, REV.APLW(MD)SR.No.76782/2025 is rejected.

¶26

(M.S.R.,J.) (A.D.M.C.,J.) 15.12.2025

¶27

Anu

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

WMP(MD).No.19832 of 2025

¶31

¶32