Dismissed¶31

Hariff.M v. The Authorized Officer

Madras HC19 Jun 2025WMP(MD)/17798/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

extension of time denied; writ miscellaneous petition dismissed; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; Article 226 Constitution of India; Hariff.M Proprietor M/s.W.Auto vs Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd; Authorized Officer; Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai; direction to vacate premises and hand over possession; showroom at Gomathipuram Sivagangai Road Madurai; compliance undertaking; one year period lapsed; earlier extension in W.M.P.(MD)No.10991 of 2024; order by S.M. Subramaniam J.; none appeared for respondents; decided 19/06/2025.

What did the court decide?

One year has lapsed since the time granted for compliance, yet the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking extension. ¶30

Hariff.M Vs The Authorized Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶2

Thursday, the Nineteenth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE

¶6

WMP(MD). No.17798 of 2024 IN

¶7

WP(MD).NO.2353 OF 2024

¶8

Hariff.M

¶9

Proprietor

¶10

M/s.W.Auto ... Petitioner

¶11

¶12

1 The Authorized Officer

¶13

M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd No. 81 3rd Floor, P.K.N.A.Complex (Upstairs Mega Mart)

¶14

By Pass Road Madurai 14

¶15

2 M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd Rep by its Branch Manager/authorized Officer K.K.Nagar Branch No. 29 Nataraj Complex 1st Floor KFC Upstairs, District Court Opp. Madurai 20

¶16

3 The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Prayer in WMP(MD).No.17798 of 2024 :-

¶20

This Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed Under Article 226 of Contitution of India, to extend the time to comply with the orders made W.M.P.(MD).No.10991 of 2024 in W.P.(MD).2353 of 2024.

¶21

Prayer in WP(MD).No.2353 of 2024 :-

¶22

This Writ Petition is filed Under Article 226 of the constitution of India,directing the respondents to grant 3 months time to vacate my company showroom installed at 2/739, Gomathipuram 6^th Main Road, Sivagangai Road, Madurai.

¶23

ORDER:- This Writ Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.Sailendrababu, Advocate for the Petitioner and

¶24

none appeared for the respondents, this Court made the following order:

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

¶27

The final order in the writ petition has been passed on 27.02.2024 with a direction to vacate the premises and hand over possession of the subject property on 28.04.2024, without issuing any further notice to the petitioner. The petitioner again filed a petition in W.M.P(MD)No.10991 of 2024 seeking extension of time and this

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Court by taking a lenient view granted further time to comply with the undertaking.

¶30

In spite of the fact that one year period lapsed, the petitioner has filed the present petition.

¶31

2.Thus, the present writ miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy //

¶34

/ /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS - I/II/III/IV)

¶35

¶36

The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai.

¶37

ORDER DATED : 19/06/2025 ========================== ORDER ========================== WMP(MD). No.17798 of 2024 IN WP(MD).NO.2353 OF 2024 Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶38

TS (10/07/2025) 3P/2C

¶39

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Hariff.M v. The Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariff.M v. The Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Vs N.Muthuselvan

Prabhu .S Vs The Principal Secretary to Government /

S.Prabhu Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

The Executive Officer Vs a.Karunakaran(Died)

The Director of School Education Vs C.Haima

The Executive Officer Vs a.Alagu