Disposed¶21

Canara Bank v. M/S.Pothys Private Ltd.

Madras HC24 Apr 2025WMP/5750/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Canara Bank Teppakulam Branch; M/s.Pothys Private Ltd.; S.Ramesh undertaking affidavit; Board Resolution 21.04.2025; non-obstruction of entry into premises; measurement work during office hours; one day notice; WMP No.5750 of 2020 in WP No.15785 of 2016; Madras High Court; disposed 24.04.2025; K.R.Shriram CJ; Mohammed Shaffiq J; E.Om Prakash Senior Counsel; Raghunathan / T.S.Gopalan and Co.; no appearance RR 2 and 3.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; affidavit of undertaking of Respondent No.1 (S.Ramesh, Managing Director, affirmed 23.04.2025, with Board Resolution dated 21.04.2025) taken on file, recording that Respondent No.1 and its officers will not obstruct the petitioner's entry into the premises for measurement and other purposes with one day's notice during office hours. ¶21

Canara Bank Vs M/S.Pothys Private Ltd. — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WMP No.5750 of 2020 in WP No.15785 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶8

WMP No.5750 of 2020 IN WP No.15785 of 2016

¶9

Canara Bank Teppakulam Branch, Rep.by its Authorised Officer and Chief Manager, No.26, Nandhikoil Street, Teppakulam, Trichy-620 002.

¶10

Petitioner

¶11

¶12

M/s.Pothys Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director Mr S Ramesh, 15 Nageswara Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600017 and 3 Others

¶13

Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Raghunathan for Mr.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For Respondent : Mr.E.Om Prakash Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Imayavaramban for R-1 : No appearance for RR 2 and 3 ORDER

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WMP No.5750 of 2020 in WP No.15785 of 2016

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶18

Pursuant to the order dated 23.04.2025, Respondent No.1 has filed an undertaking in the form of an affidavit of one S.Ramesh, Managing Director of first respondent, affirmed on 23.04.2025. The Board Resolution is dated 21.04.2025.

¶19

Sri.Om Prakash states that expecting the Court may give direction to Respondent No.1 to give an undertaking, the Board Resolution was passed a day before. The Registry to take on file the affidavit.

¶20

Sri.Om Prakash further states that Respondent No.1 or any of its officers will not obstruct petitioner from entering the premises for measurement and other purposes, provided one day notice is given and the measurement work is carried out during office hours.

¶21

Petition is disposed of.

¶22

(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.) 24.04.2025

¶23

sra

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

WMP No.5750 of 2020 in WP No.15785 of 2016

¶26

¶27