The Secretary v. a.Ganesan

Madras HC2 Jul 2025WMP/4884/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 47 days delay; review application; Rev.Aplw.SR.No.4552 of 2025; WMP No. 4884 of 2025; Sentamizh/Senthamizh Oriental College; Madurai Tamil Sangam; A. Ganesan; Junior Assistant; Director of Collegiate Education; Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education; Madras High Court; N. Anand Venkatesh J.; admission posted to 08.07.2025; delay condoned; miscellaneous petition ordered.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 47-day delay in filing the review application; Registry directed to number the review application and post it for admission and hearing on 08.07.2025. ¶¶21

The Secretary Vs a.Ganesan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.No.4552 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02-07-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 IN

¶7

REV.APLW SR NO. 4552 OF 2025

¶8

The Secretary Sentamizh Oriental College, Madurai Tamil Sangam, No.54, Tamil Sangam Salai, Madurai.

Petitioner(s)

A.Ganesan

S/o.T.Arumugam, Junior Assistant, Senthamizh Oriental College, No.12, Sundararajapuram, New Rice mill 3rd Street, Madurai. AND 2 OTHERS

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

PRAYER

¶15

To condone the delay of 47 days in filing the review application.

¶16

For Petitioner: Mr.H.Adaikala Arockiaraj For Respondent(s) Mr.Mr.E.Martin Jayakumar for R1 Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate for R2 & R3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.No.4552 of 2025

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Heard the learned counsels for the parties. Satisfied with the reasons

¶21

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the writ miscellaneous petition is ordered.

¶22

Registry is directed to number the review application, if the papers are otherwise in order, and post it for admission on 08.07.2025. It is made clear that the main review application itself will be taken up for hearing on that date.

¶23

02-07-2025

¶24

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶25

¶26

¶27

1.A.Ganesan S/o.T.Arumugam, Junior Assistant, Senthamizh Oriental College, No.12, Sundararajapuram, New Rice mill 3rd Street, Madurai.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.No.4552 of 2025

¶30

2.The Director Of Collegiate Education I.A.S.E. Campus, 577, Anna Salai,

¶31

Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.

¶32

3.The Regional Joint Director Of Collegiate Education,

¶33

Madurai Region, Madurai.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.No.4552 of 2025

¶36

N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

¶37

¶38

WMP No. 4884 of 2025 IN REV.APLW SR NO. 4552 OF 2025

¶39

02-07-2025

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Secretary v. a.Ganesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Secretary v. a.Ganesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Arumugam Vs The District Supply Officer

Meenakshi Ananda Vs the Chief Judge

Vasanth Benny Vs the Chairman

M/s.Century steels Vs Southern Railway

M.Jeevarekha Vs the Secretary

Anandhi Vs the Managing Director