Disposed¶33

Naresh Malhotra v. K.Thilagaraj

Madras HC27 Mar 2025WMP/26550/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 27.03.2025 closing impleading petition W.M.P.No.26550 of 2024 in W.P.No.20763 of 2024; applicants claiming right and title over the subject property left free to adjudicate before the Civil Court; impleadment as party respondents in the writ petition not examined; filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; single-judge bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh.

What did the court decide?

The Court held it unnecessary to go into the impleading/title issue in this petition; since the petitioners had already sought impleadment as defendants in the suit, they were left open to adjudicate their case before the Civil Court. ¶28

Naresh Malhotra Vs K.Thilagaraj — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.M.P.No.26550 of 2024 in W.P.No.20763 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.03.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.M.P.No.26550 of 2024 in W.P.No.20763 of 2024

¶7

1.Naresh Malhotra

¶8

2.Rajeev Malhotra

¶9

3.Renu Bhotra

¶10

.. Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.K.Thilagaraj

¶13

2.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpat.

¶14

3.The District Revenue Officer, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu Dt.

¶15

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Chengalpattu Dt.

¶16

5.The Sub Registrar, Guduvancherry, Chengalpattu District.

¶17

6.Devi .. Respondents

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Prayer

¶21

W.M.P.No.26550 of 2024 in W.P.No.20763 of 2024

¶22

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶23

praying to implead the petitioners herein as party respondents in the present writ petition.

¶24

For petitioners : Mr.B.Satish Sundar

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

This petition has been filed to implead the petitioners herein as party respondents in the present writ petition.

¶27

2.This impleading petition has been filed on the ground that the petitioners in this petition are also claiming right and title over the subject property.

¶28

3.It is not necessary for this Court to go into this issue in this petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that already a petition has been filed to implead the petitioners in this petition as defendants in the suit. Hence, it is left open to the petitioners to adjudicate the case before the Civil Court.

¶29

2/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.M.P.No.26550 of 2024 in W.P.No.20763 of 2024

¶32

4.In the light of the order passed in the main writ petition, this

¶33

petition stands closed.

¶34

27.03.2025