Allowed¶6

S.Bhramasakthi v. the District Collector

Madras HC3 Jun 2025WMP/20070/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Batch of 17 writ miscellaneous petitions (WMPs) in writ petitions, Madras High Court, common order 03.06.2025 by M. Sundar J. (bench: Hemant Chandangoudar J.). Dispensation with production of original administrative order dated 11.04.2025 (Na.Ka.No.3881/2020/23/A1) granted where only photocopy was served on counsel and filed with typed set; one-off indulgence, authenticity uncontested; future support affidavits must adequately articulate grounds. Counsel: L. Mouli for writ petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to dispense with production of the original impugned order dated 11.04.2025 (Na.Ka.No.3881/2020/23/A1) granted; captioned WMPs ordered as prayed for, on the basis that the photocopied order had been filed with the typed set and its authenticity was uncontested. ¶6

S.Bhramasakthi Vs the District Collector — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.M.P.No.20070 of 2025 in W.P.No.17852 of 2025 etc. batch

¶2

W.M.P. Nos.20070, 20075, 20078, 20081, 20085, 20090, 20087, 20091, 20096, 20101, 20105, 20125, 20127, 20133, 20135, 20139 and 20141 of 2025 in

¶3

in W.P.Nos.17852, 17856, 17860, 17862, 17866, 17870, 17867, 17871, 17873, 17876, 17879, 17895, 17898, 17903, 17908, 17910 and 17918 of 2025

¶4

M.SUNDAR, J. and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

¶5

COMMON ORDER

¶6

[made by M.SUNDAR, J.]

¶7

This common order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' [hereinafter 'WMPs' for the sake of brevity].

¶8

Captioned WMPs have been filed with prayer to dispense with production of 'original order dated 11.04.2025 bearing reference Na.Ka.No.3881/2020/23/A1' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

¶9

Mr.L.Mouli, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, is before this Court.

¶10

4 . Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the petitioners were not served with original impugned order and only photocopy of the impugned order was served on the writ petitioners' counsel; therefore, photocopy of the impugned order was filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMPs.

¶11

Page Nos.1/2

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.M.P.No.20070 of 2025 in W.P.No.17852 of 2025 etc. batch

¶14

M. SUNDAR, J.

¶15

and

¶16

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

¶17

cad

¶18

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned order is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

¶19

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for.

¶20

cad

¶21

[M.S., J.] [H.C., J.] 03.06.2025 (2/2)

¶22

W.M.P.No.20070 of 2025 in W.P.No.17852 of 2025 etc . batch

¶23

Page Nos.2/2

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis