Senthilkumar v. the Authorised Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Correction of typographical error in passport application number (TR207644284524 vs TR2076442484524); amendment of writ prayer unnecessary; fresh certified copy directed. Madras High Court, single judge (D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.), order dated 04.04.2025, W.M.P.No.11463 of 2025 in W.P.No.6020 of 2025, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Parties: Senthilkumar (petitioner) v. Regional Passport Office, Tiruchirapalli and Inspector of Police, Padalur Police Station. No precedents cited; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Amendment of the prayer held unnecessary; paragraph Nos.1, 2 and 4 of the order dated 21.02.2025 to carry the correct application No.TR2076442484524 instead of No.TR207644284524, and the Registry directed to issue a fresh order copy. ¶33