The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ appeal filed against an interim order of a Single Judge. The Court held the appeal was not maintainable as the appellant had an alternative remedy before the Single Judge who passed the order.
Writ appeal dismissed; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WA.(MD)No.3081 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 04.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
WA(MD)No.3081 of 2025 and
WMP(MD)No.17884 of 2025
Jayasuriya : Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
(Formerly Aravakurichi Taluk), Karur District.
5.The Head Surveyor, Revenue Office Building, Pugalur Taluk, Karur District.
WA.(MD)No.3081 of 2025
6.Thiruvenkadam : Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause XV of Letter Patent, to set aside the impugned order passed in WP(MD)No.31054 of 2025, dated 31/10/2025 passed by this Court and allow this writ appeal and pass such further or other orders.
For Appellant : Mr.P.M.Vishnu Varthanan For R1 to R5 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For 6th Respondent : Mr.A.N.Ramanathan
O R D E R
(Order of this Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN. J .,)
This Writ Appeal is preferred against the order passed in WP(MD)No.31054 of 2025, dated 31/10/2025.
2
WA.(MD)No.3081 of 2025
3.Since this writ appeal is filed against the interim order, dated 31/10/2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, in WP(MD)No.31054 of 2025, the Writ Appeal is not maintainable. The appellant has got alternative remedy before the civil Court in the pending proceedings or before the learned Single Judge of this Court, who passed the impugned order, after filing a report in the main writ petition. So, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.
4.In the result, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(P.V., J) (L.V.G., J ) 04.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No
er
3
WA.(MD)No.3081 of 2025
To,
4
WA.(MD)No.3081 of 2025
P.VELMURUGAN, J and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
er
WA(MD)No.3081 of 2025
04.11.2025
5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ appeal is maintainable against an interim order passed by a Single Judge when an alternative remedy exists.
Jayasuriya
State of Tamil Nadu
Commissioner of Survey and Settlement
District Revenue Officer, Karur
Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur
Thiruvenkadam
P. VELMURUGAN
L. VICTORIA GOWRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
