Disposed¶25

The Secretary v. a.Bagavath Singh

Madras HC13 Feb 2025WA(MD)/302/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; W.A.(MD)No.302 of 2021; C.M.P.(MD)No.1023 of 2021; writ appeal closed as infructuous; surcharge liability cleared by legal heirs of deceased first respondent A.Bagavath Singh; Nilakottai Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited; impugned order 27.11.2020 in W.P.(MD).No.14892 of 2020; Clause XV Letters Patent; G.R.Swaminathan J.; M.Jothiraman J.; 13.02.2025; no costs; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeal closed as infructuous; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition C.M.P.(MD)No.1023 of 2021 also closed. ¶25

The Secretary Vs a.Bagavath Singh — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.A.(MD)No.302 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 13.02.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶6

W.A.(MD)No.302 of 2021 and

¶7

C.M.P.(MD)No.1023 of 2021

¶8

The Secretary,

¶9

A.2486 Nilakottai Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Nilakottai, Dindigul.

¶10

... Appellant

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.A.Bagavath Singh, Ex.President, S/o.Thiru Ayyadurai, 12-6-3B/1B, Ananda Nagar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

¶13

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Office of the District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶14

3.The Sub Registrar, Registration Department, Office of the Sub Registrar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.A.(MD)No.302 of 2021

¶19

Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order dated 27.11.2020 passed in W.P.(MD).No.14892 of 2020 on the file of this Court.

¶20

For Appellant : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam, Government Advocate for R2 & R3.

¶22

JUDGMENT

¶23

(Judgment of the court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.)

¶24

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the surcharge liability had already been cleared by the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ appeal.

¶25

2.The writ appeal is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

(G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 13.02.2025

¶27

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.A.(MD)No.302 of 2021