Allowed

The Member Secretary/Chief Executive Officer v. Sivakumar

Madras HC26 Sept 2025WA(MD)/2419/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeals against an order granting a candidate 900 marks under the eminent sports persons quota for medical admission despite her tournaments lacking seven-country participation. The Bench held 'athlete' includes team sport players, so the seven-country condition applies, reversed the writ Court and allowed the appeals.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeals allowed; order dated 30.07.2025 in W.P.(MD)No.20012 of 2025 reversed; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

The Member Secretary/Chief Executive Officer Vs… — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

RESERVED ON : 09.09.2025

¶4

PRONOUNCED ON : 26.09.2025

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶7

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.13771, 13131 & 14176 of 2025

¶8

W.A.(MD)No.2419 of 2025:

¶9

The Member Secretary/Chief Executive Officer, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Raja Muthiah Road, Periymet, Chennai.

¶10

...Appellant

¶11

/Vs./

¶12

Sivakumar

¶13

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Sports, Development and Youth Welfare, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶14

The Secretary, The Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education and Research, No.162, Periyar EVR High Road,

¶15

1/18

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶18

Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

¶19

...Respondents

¶20

PRAYER:- Writ Appeal - filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order made in W.P.(MD)No20012 of 2025 dated 30.07.2025 on the file of this Court.

¶21

For Appellant : Ms.N.S.Tanvi For Respondent : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian (R1) Mr.J.Ashok (R2) Additional Government Pleader Ms.Sneha Muddha (R3) Special Counsel

¶22

W.A.(MD)No.2419 of 2025:

¶23

The Secretary, The Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education and Research, No.162, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

¶24

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Sports, Development and Youth Welfare, Secretariat, Chennai. ...Appellants

¶25

/Vs./

¶26

2/18

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶29

Sivakumar

¶30

The Member Secretary/Chief Executive Officer, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Raja Muthiah Road, Periymet, Chennai.

¶31

...Respondents

¶32

PRAYER:- Writ Appeal - filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order made in W.P.(MD)No20012 of 2025 dated 30.07.2025 on the file of this Court and allow the writ appeal.

¶33

For Appellants : Ms.Sneha Muddha For Respondent : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian (R1) Ms.N.S.Tanvi (R2)

¶34

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶35

(Judgment of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

¶36

These appeals challenge an order of the writ Court dated 30.07.2025. The facts in brief premised on which the writ petition was

¶37

filed are as follows. Sivakumar, R1, is the father of Harini (‘candidate’), who has achieved laurels in the event of shooting ball, in both national

¶38

3/18

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶41

and international events.

¶42

The candidate had appeared for the NEET undergraduate examination for medical college admission for academic year 2025-26 under the sports persons category, seeking 900 marks for her participation in various competitive events. She had however been awarded only 200 marks for participation, which according to her is contrary to the stipulations under the prospectus. R1 had thus preferred a writ petition seeking a mandamus for awarding of 900 marks for her achievement in sports and for consideration of her candidature for medical college admission based on those marks.

¶43

The writ Court allowed the writ petition concluding that her participation in the Shooting Ball World Cup and Asian Shooting Ball Championship, entitled her to 900 points as claimed. In arriving at this conclusion, the prospectus was interpreted to state that the eligibility conditions in paragraph 4(a) of Annexure VII would apply only to individual sporting events and not team events such as shooting ball, volley ball, football, basket-ball and others.

¶44

4/18

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶47

Upon such interpretation, the Court held that there was no

¶48

necessity for participation of seven different countries in the tournaments in which the candidate had competed and hence that condition should not be imposed in her case to deny her 900 marks. The Court has also referred to the Indian Olympics Committee (IOC) Code of Ethics, emphasizing the importance of a quota for sportsmen and the encouragement to be extended to them.

¶49

The Writ Court has relied upon the judgments of the Hon'ble

¶50

Supreme Court in S.Krishna Sradha Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others (2020 (17) SCC 465)¹ and Dev Gupta Vs. PEC University of Technology and Others (2023 (20) SCC 166)² and of this Court in V.Periyadurai vs. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare and Others ( WP(MD)No.5209 of 2017 dated 20.07.2017)³ .

¶51

As against that order, the Sports Development Authority of India (SDAI) and the Department of Sports Development and Youth Welfare, State of Tamilnadu have preferred the present writ appeals.

¶52

1 2020 (17) SCC 465

¶53

2 2023 (20) SCC 166

¶54

3 WP(MD)No.5209 of 2017 dated 20.07.2017

¶55

5/18

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶58

The submissions of Ms.Sneha Muddha and Ms.N.S.Tanvi,

¶59

learned counsel for the appellants are to the effect that participation of the candidate in the first Shooting Ball World Cup and second Asian Shooting Ball Championship cannot be taken into account, as those events did not have the participation of seven countries as required under the prospectus. The purpose of imposition of the condition is to ensure that the recognition awarded by way of incentive marks has a proper basis and that there was sufficient international participation in that event.

¶60

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants would emphasize that there has to be a methodology by which recognition may be accorded. They would urge that all participants in sports events are ‘athletes’ and the exclusion of team players from the definition of 'athlete' is incorrect as seen from the IOC Code and the definitions under the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 ('NAD Act').

¶61

We have heard learned counsel and studied the relevant papers.

¶62

The candidate had sought admission to medical colleges on the

¶63

6/18

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶66

basis of her exemplary performance in the sport of shooting ball, seeking 900 marks for securing a gold medal in the second Asian Shooting Ball Championship held at Nepal on 01.02.2025 and 02.02.2025 and bronze medal in the first World Cup Shooting Ball Championship held in New Delhi on 02.03.2024 and 03.03.2024.

¶67

She was denied the aforesaid mark and instead, awarded 100 marks for participating in the National tournaments held in Odisha and Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh between 07.01.2025 to 09.01.2025, and 29.03.2024 to 31.03.2024 respectively.

¶68

The denial was on the basis that International tournaments fall under category I in the prospectus, that required the candidate to have participated in a tournament with minimum participation of seven countries. In addition, the tournaments ought to have been approved by the Indian Olympics Association (IOA), Sports Authority of India (SAI) and Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (MYAS).

¶69

Admittedly, neither of the tournaments had participants from seven countries, both the Asian Shooting Ball Championship and World

¶70

7/18

¶71

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶72

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶73

Cup Shooting Ball Championship having participation only from three countries.

¶74

The procedure for admission to medical colleges includes counselling for special categories such as children of ex-service men, persons with benchmark disability and eminent sports persons and stringent verification of the original certificates produced in support of the claim by the candidates. Seven seats were reserved for MBBS and one in BDS course for eminent sports persons. The mode of selection is as per the guidelines set out in Annexure VII, extracted below:-

¶75

ANNEXURE-VII

¶76

ALLOTMENT OF SEATS FORCANDIDATES UNDER QUOTA FOR EMINENT SPORTS PERSONS FOR 2025-2026 SESSION

¶77

1. The purpose of this quota is to recognise and give weightage to the sports eminence of the candidates and hence marks for sports achievements alone will be considered in ranking the candidates. The candidates are expected to continue good performance in sports, even admission.

¶78

2. The candidate shall submit all the sports certificates along with participation certificates and relevant forms issued by Association /

¶79

8/18

¶80

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶81

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶82

Federation concerned, but only one highest achievement in a tournament (among the International, National, State, Regional and District) in an academic year will be considered for awarding marks. (Refre recognized Association list is annexed) 3. Selection of the candidate will be based on the marks obtained by the candidate strictly following the guidelines, given in the tables.

¶83

Table (I) - Marks for Recognised International Achievement

¶84

Sl. No.	Competition	Gold	Silver	Bronz e	Partic ipatio n
1.	International (Representing India Category - IA, IB) -Once in 4years	1000	850	650	400
2.	International (Representing India Category - II) Once in 2 years	500	450	400	250
3.	International (Representing India Category - III) Once in Every year	400	350	300	200

¶85

Table (II) - Marks for Recognised National Achievement

¶86

Sl.	Competitions	Gold	Silver	Bronz	Partic
No.				e	ipatio
					n

¶87

9/18

¶88

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶89

¶90

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶91

1.	National Championships/National Games-Organised by National Federations/IOA	190	160	130	100
2.	School Games Federation of India (SGFI) National Level Competition	190	160	130	100
3.	KHELO India Youth Games -National Level	190	160	130	100

¶92

Table (III) - Marks for Recognised State Championship and State Competition

¶93

Sl.No.	Competitions	A	llocation	of Mark	s
		Gold	Silver	Bronz e	Partici pation
1.	State Championship Revenue District-Organised by State Sports Associations	95	80	65	45
2.	Bharathiyar day Sports Meet (State Level)	95	80	65	45
3.	Republic days Sports Meet (State Level)	95	80	65	45
4.	KVS/CBSE/CISCE (ICSE) Board National Sports Meet	95	80	65	45
5.	SDAT-State level Chief	95	80	65	45
	Minister's Trophy for Sports & Games

¶94

10/18

¶95

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶96

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶97

Table (IV) - Marks for Recognised Regional Level Achievements

¶98

Sl.	Competitions		Allocatio	n of Marks
No.		Gold	Silver	Bronze	Participati
					on
1.	KVS/CBSE/CISC E (ICSE) Board	60	45	30	10
	National Sports Meet (Regional Level)

¶99

Table (V) - Marks for Recognised District Level Achievements

¶100

Sl	Competitions	A	llocation	of Mark	s
. N o.		Gold	Silver	_Bronze _	Partici pation
_1. _	District Tournaments / Sports Meet / Championships conducted by District Associations (Recognised by SDAT/TNOA)	45	30	15	5
_2. _	District / Education District Inter School Competition(District Level)	45	30	15	5
_3. _	SDAT – District Level Chief Minister's Trophy for Sports & Games	45	30	15	5

¶101

11/18

¶102

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶103

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶104

Table (V-A) - Marks for University Level Competitions only for PG Admission
Sl.

¶105

Table (V-A) - Marks for University Level Competitions only for PG Admission

¶106

Sl.	Competitions		Allocatio	n of M	arks
N o.		Gold	Silver	Bronz e	Partici pation
1.	Inter Collegiate Competitions (Zonal & Inter Zonal Level)(Recognized by concerned University)	45	30	15	5
2.	South Zone Inter University Competitions conducted by Association of Indian Universities.	95	80	65	45
3.	All India Inter University competitions conducted by Association of Indian Universities.	190	160	130	100
4.	Khelo India University Games	190	160	130	100
Go	ld (I Position) Silver (II Position	)	Bro	nze (III	Position)

¶107

4. (a) Guidelines For International Tournaments:

¶108

Category-I : (1-A) Olympic Games (Summer/Winter), Youth Olympic Games (Summer/Winter Commonwealth Games and Asian Games (Games organized in 4 years frequency by the International Olympic Committee).

¶109

(1-B) World Championship, Commonwealth championship, World Cup- (organized in 4 Years frequency by the International Sports Federations).

¶110

¶111

Category-II: World Championship, World cup, Asian Championship, SAF Games (South Asian Games).

¶112

12/18

¶113

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶114

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶115

Commonwealth championship Organized in 2 years frequency by the International Sports Federation.

¶116

Eligibility for athletes requires participation in an event involving at least seven different countries and such competitions should have been approved by Indian Olympics Association (IOA), Sports Authority of India (SAI) and Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (MYAS). Open or Invitational or Memorial or any indifferent nomenclature or title of tournaments or Championships at International level, not approved by any of the above authority will not he considered for marks.

¶117

Category-III: Asian Championships, Commonwealth Games, World cup, World Championship, Grand Prix, Grand slam - Organized in Every year by the International Sports Federation. Eligibility for athletes requires participation in an event involving at least seven different countries and such competitions should have been approved by Indian Olympics Association (IOA), Sports Authority of India (SAI) and Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (MYAS), Government of India.

¶118

1. Participation or achievement in International tournaments will be considered only with earlier achievements at National and State level tournaments. Direct participation / Selection trails / Camps any International or National tournaments will not be considered for award of marks.

¶119

2. The highest achievement in only one annual regular tournament, officially conducted in a regular manner by the member National Olympic Committee (NOCs) authorized by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) or International Sports Federations affiliated to the IOC will be considered for award of marks. The Players/ Sports person representing the Country in such tournaments through Indian Olympic Association (IOA) or respective National Sports Federations recognised by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of India or

¶120

13/18

¶121

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶122

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶123

IOA will be considered for award of marks in each year.

¶124

3. Only tournaments officially recognised by the Indian Olympic Association/respective official National Sports Federations recognized by MAYS will be considered for the award of marks (for each year) from 01.06.2021 to 31.05.2022, 01.06.2022 to 31.05.2023, 01.06.2023 to 31.05.2024 and 01.06.2024 to 31.05.2025.Certificates of Participation or Achievements in tournaments, submitted along with Form I alone are eligible for marks indicated in Table (I) above (should be submitted before the last date of submission of application).

¶125

Tables I to V-A set out the marks for according recognition for International, National, State, Regional, District and University Level Competitions. Clause 4(a) thereof stipulates guidelines for international tournaments and the eligibility criteria are (i) participation in an event where at least seven countries have participated and (ii) the competitions should be approved by IOA, SAI and MYAS. Eligibility for tournaments in categories II and III are similar.

¶126

The learned Judge has concluded that the expression 'athlete' used in 4(a), applies only to persons who have participated in individual events such as running and jumping, also incidentally noting that any person associated with sports can be referred to as an athlete.

¶127

Section 2(d) of the NAD Act defines an ‘athlete’ as ' any person

¶128

14/18

¶129

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶130

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶131

who competes in any sport at the national level or international level or participates in any competition or event to which this Act applies.'

¶132

We are hence unable to agree with the conclusion of the learned Judge that the use of the term 'athlete' in clause 4(a) would not stand attracted in the case of participants in team sports and that consequently the eligibility criteria prescribed in clause 4(a) does not apply to the candidate.

¶133

On the other hand, every participant in a sporting activity, be it an individual sport or a team event, is an ‘athlete’ and hence, eligibility criteria for an athlete (including those who have participated in team events) would require the participation of a minimum of seven countries in that event, to be entitled to the benefit of the quota.

¶134

The other point that has weighed with the writ Court, is that Shooting Ball is an indigenous Indian sport and ought to have been accorded preferential treatment in the prospectus. On this score, we agree. Our attention has been drawn to the prospectus issued by other States, where preferential treatment has been accorded to indigenous

¶135

15/18

¶136

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶137

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶138

Indian sports. While we wish that the prospectus in question had, likewise, provided for some preference to indigenous sports, unfortunately, that is not to be, and the present prospectus does not provide for any such preferential treatment.

¶139

In such circumstances, unless there had been a challenge to the prospectus perse, we cannot read into the prospectus a preference that it does not contain. However, we recommend strongly, that this aspect of the matter be taken into account, and preference is accorded to participants in indigenous sports, going forward. The undertaking of Ms.Sneha Muddha on 30.07.2025 that a seat would be reserved for the candidate, as recorded in the interim order dated 30.07.2025 is hence recorded redundant.

¶140

In the light of the discussion as above, we intervene in the order of the writ Court and reverse the same. These writ appeals are allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶141

[A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 26.09.2025

¶142

NCC :Yes/No

¶143

16/18

¶144

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶145

W.A.(MD)No.2419 and 2320 of 2025

¶146

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes sm