J.Gurusamy v. Marimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Appeal dismissed; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.A(MD)No.2315 of 2025; G.R. Swaminathan; K. Rajasekar; J. Gurusamy; Marimuthu; HR&CE; Tamil Nadu HR&CE Act Section 63(e); O.A.No.13 of 2024; Joint Commissioner HR&CE Madurai; order dated 28.03.2025 quashed; W.P(MD)No.18490 of 2025; conferment of honours; community honour; representative capacity; impleading trustees; five villages; Arulmighu Mariamman Thirukovil Irukkangudi; Sattur Taluk Virudhunagar; Executive Officer sole respondent; breach of procedure; nine months; Clause 15 Letters Patent; C.M.P(MD)No.13036 of 2025 closed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
The Court endorses the learned single Judge's approach: Gurusamy sought relief for a community, not a personal honour, yet did not file the OA in a representative capacity, did not implead the members of the trust board, and made the Executive Officer the sole respondent — a clear breach of procedure, which is why the single Judge quashed the order.