M.Ramasamy Gounder v. a.Thiruppathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court Madurai Bench; WA(MD)No.1954 of 2024; CMP(MD)No.14441 of 2024; writ appeal against order dated 26.03.2024 in WP(MD)No.6763 of 2024; Clause 15 (Clause XV) Letters Patent; M.Ramasamy Gounder v. A.Thiruppathi and others; HR&CE Department (Commissioner Chennai, Joint Commissioner Tiruchirappalli, Executive Officer); Arulmighu Ponnar Sangar Temple, Valanadu Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District; Thiruppani / renovation works; Rs.10,00,000 expenditure observation unsupported by records; liberty to file review petition before learned single Judge within thirty days; status quo on renovation works till review filed; no costs; notice not served / no appearance by respondents 4 to 6; decided 23.01.2025 by M.S.Ramesh, J. and A.D.Maria Clete, J.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal stood closed (without adjudication on merits) with liberty to the appellant and respondents 4 to 6 to file a review petition before the learned single Judge at least within thirty days from receipt of a copy of the judgment; till such filing, the parties were directed to maintain status quo with regard to the renovation (Thiruppani) works; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (CMP(MD) No.14441 of 2024) closed.