Dismissed¶27

S. Krishnan v. The State Information Commissioner

Madras HC16 Oct 2025WA/2289/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ appeals; dismissal as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement; no costs; connected CMPs closed; Madras High Court; Clause 15 Letters Patent; W.P. Nos.4909 and 4908 of 2015 orders dated 18.07.2022; Tamil Nadu State Information Commissioner; District Collector Erode; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the Writ Appeals; appeals dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions closed. ¶27

S. Krishnan Vs The State Information Commissioner — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.A. Nos.2289 and 2290 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 16.10.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.A. Nos.2289 and 2290 of 2022 and C.M.P. Nos.17471 and 17475 of 2022

¶7

S.Krishnan

¶8

... Appellant in both appeals

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, No.2, Thiagaraya Salai, Near Alaiamman Koil Street,

¶11

Teynampet, Chennai-18.

¶12

2.The District Collector, Erode District. ... 1^st and 2^nd respondents in both appeals

¶13

3.C.Gunasekaran ...3^rd Respondent in W.A.No.2289 of 2022 4.R.Velusamy ...3^rd Respondent in W.A.No.2290 of 2022

¶14

PRAYER in W.A. No.2289 of 2022: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order made in W.P. No.4909 of 2015 dated 18.07.2022.

¶15

PRAYER in W.A. No.2290 of 2022 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order made in W.P. No.4908 of 2015 dated 18.07.2022.

¶16

For Appellant : Mr.J.Melwin Jabaz in both appeals For Respondent 2 : Mr.S.Senthil Murugan

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.A. Nos.2289 and 2290 of 2022

¶20

in both appeals Special Government Pleader

¶21

For Respondents 1 & 3 : No appearance in both appeals

¶22

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶23

(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. )

¶24

Today, when these matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

¶25

for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw these Writ

¶26

Appeals and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶27

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Writ Appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶28

[S.M.S., J.] [M.S.Q., J.]

¶29

16.10.2025

¶30

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/ No mka

¶31

Page 2 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.A. Nos.2289 and 2290 of 2022

¶34

To:

¶35

1.The State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, No.2, Thiagaraya Salai, Near Alaiamman Koil Street, Teynampet, Chennai-18.

¶36