Disposed¶23

P. Subburaman v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC17 Sept 2025WA/1434/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Appeal W.A.No.1434 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.13934 of 2023; High Court of Judicature at Madras; decided 17.09.2025; appellant P. Subburaman S/o. Perumal Reddiar; respondents State of Tamil Nadu (Municipal Administration and Water Distribution, Fort St. George, Chennai-9) and Commissioner, Virudhachalam Municipality; challenge to order dated 02.12.2021 in W.P.No.21239 of 2019; appeal not pressed; liberty to submit representation; disposed of without merits adjudication; no order as to costs; Clause 15 Letters Patent; Judges S.M. Subramaniam and Mohammed Shaffiq.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal disposed of with liberty to the appellant to submit a representation to the authorities; connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No.13934 of 2023) closed; no order as to costs. ¶23

P. Subburaman Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.09.2025

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶5

W.A.No.1434 of 2023

¶6

and

¶7

C.M.P.No.13934 of 2023

¶8

P.Subburaman S/o.Perumal Reddiar

¶9

... Appellant

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary Municipal Administration and Water Distribution, Fort St.George Chennai-9.

¶12

The Commissioner Virudhachalam Municipality Virudhachalam. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer:

¶14

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 02.12.2021 passed in W.P.No.21239 of 2019 and thereby, allow the appeal.

¶15

Page Nos.1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

For Appellant : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.P.Srinivas, for R2

¶18

J U D G M E N T

¶19

(Judgment of the Court delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM)

¶20

Mr.N.Suresh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant

¶21

would submit that the appellant is not insisting on the grounds raised in the writ appeal and has taken a decision to approach the authorities by way of a representation. This being the submission made, no further adjudication on merits needs to be undertaken by this Court.

¶22