Dismissed¶31

The Director of School Education v. S.Rosline

Madras HC25 Mar 2025WA/1254/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous; Madras High Court; Clause 15 of the Letters Patent; challenge to order dated 28.04.2022 in WP No.10207 of 2022; Director of School Education; Chief Educational Officer Thiruppur; District Educational Officer Palladam/Tiruppur; S. Rosline; Correspondent, C.S.I. Aided Elementary School, Kathankanni; nothing survives for adjudication; no costs; CMP No. 12552 of 2023 closed; R. Suresh Kumar J.; A.D. Maria Clete J.; 25-03-2025.

What did the court decide?

None — appeal dismissed as infructuous with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (CMP No. 12552 of 2023) closed. ¶31

The Director of School Education Vs S.Rosline — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.A No. 1254 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25-03-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

W.A No. 1254 of 2023 and CMP NO. 12552 OF 2023

¶7

The Director of School Education

¶8

College Road, Chennai 6. and 2 Others

¶9

2.The Chief Educational Officer

¶10

Thiruppur, Thiruppur District

¶11

The District Educational Officer

¶12

Palladam, Thiruppur District. Now re-designated as District Educational Officer (Elementary), Tiruppur.

¶13

... Appellants

¶14

¶15

S.Rosline

¶16

W/o. Baskar Babu, No. L-50, Periyar Nagar, Erode, Erode District

¶17

2.The Correspondent

¶18

C.S.I. Aided Elementary School, Kathankanni, Thiruppur District

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

PRAYER

¶21

Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 28.04.2022 made in WP No.10207 of 2022 and allow this Writ Appeal.

¶22

For Appellants : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Additional Government Pleader

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.V.Sivalingam for M/s.C.S.Associates – for R1 R2 – Served, No appearance

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.A No. 1254 of 2023

¶26

R.SURESH KUMAR J. AND A.D.MARIA CLETE J.

¶27

KST

¶28

JUDGMENT

¶29

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.Suresh Kumar J.)

¶30

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellant Department submits that nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ Appeal.

¶31

Recording the said submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous as no further adjudication is required. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶32

(R.SURESH KUMAR J.) (A.D.MARIA CLETE J.) 25-03-2025

¶33

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶34

¶35