Mythili v. Sarvanakumar

Madras HC15 Apr 2025TR CMP/915/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer of matrimonial case under Section 24 CPC; Madras High Court; Tr. C.M.P.No. 915 of 2025; P.T. Asha J.; 15.04.2025; HMOP.No.94 of 2024 shifted from Sub Court Mettupalayam (Coimbatore) to Sub Court Avinashi (Tiruppur); wife-petitioner's illness and surgery; custody/care of two children; aged parents; non-payment of maintenance by husband; convenience-of-wife transfer granted.

What did the court decide?

HMOP.No.94 of 2024 ordered to be withdrawn from the Sub Court, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District and transferred to the Sub Court, Avinashi, Tiruppur District; connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P. No. 20401 of 2025) closed; no costs awarded. ¶25-26

Mythili Vs Sarvanakumar — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Tr. C.M.P.No. 915 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 15.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

¶6

Tr. C.M.P.No. 915 of 2025 & C.M.P. No. 20401 of 2025

Mythili

...Petitioner

Vs.

Saravanakumar ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Transfer Petition is filed under Section 24 of the CPC, to withdraw HMOP.No.94 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District and transfer the same to Sub Court, Avinashi, Tiruppur District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. K.Prabhakaran : For Respondent No Appearance.

¶13

1/5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Tr. C.M.P.No. 915 of 2025

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The Transfer Petition is filed to withdraw HMOP.No.94 of 2024

¶18

on the file of the Sub Court, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District and transfer the same to Sub Court, Avinashi, Tiruppur District.

¶19

The petitioner and her two children are living in Tiruppur and both daughters are studying at Tiruppur. The petitioner is suffering from infectious disease and she has to undergo surgery. The petitioner has to take care of her children as well as her aged parents and finds it difficult to travel to Coimbatore to attend hearings. The respondent / husband is not giving any maintenance to herself and her two children and it is she who is taking care of the educational expenses of the children with the help of her parents.

¶20