Allowed¶29

Shabanapriya v. Manivannan

Madras HC22 Apr 2025TR CMP/29/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tr.C.M.P. under Section 24 Civil Procedure Code; transfer of H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2024 (restitution of conjugal rights) from Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai to Subordinate Court, Chengalpet; both parties at Maraimalai Nagar; wife-petitioner, husband-respondent ex parte; transfer allowed, no costs; connected C.M.P.No.724 of 2025 closed.

What did the court decide?

Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2025 allowed without costs: H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2024 withdrawn from the Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai and transferred to the Subordinate Court, Chengalpet; connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No.724 of 2025) closed. ¶29

Shabanapriya Vs Manivannan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2025

¶7

and C.M.P.No.724 of 2025

Shabanapriya

... Petitioner

Manivannan ... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2024 from the Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai and transfer the same to the Subordinate Court, Chengalpet.

¶13

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Vasavi Sridevi

¶14

For Respondent : Private Notice -servedNo Appearance

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2025

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The petitioner-wife has filed this transfer petition seeking to transfer H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2024 filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights before the Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai to the Subordinate Court, Chengalpet.

¶20

The petitioner would submit that she is residing at Maraimalai Nagar which comes within the jurisdiction of the Subordinate Court, Chengalpet. That apart, the respondent-husband is also gainfully employed at Maraimalai Nagar and the petition has been filed at Mayiladuthurai only to harass the petitioner. Therefore, she would seek to have the petition transferred.

¶21

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondent

¶22

though served has not chosen to enter appearance either in person or

¶23

through counsel.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2025

¶27

Considering the fact that the respondent-husband is

¶28

employed at Maraimalai Nagar and the petitioner is also residing therein, it would be in the interest of both parties, to have the H.M.O.P.No.99 of 2024 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai transferred to the file of the Subordinate Court, Chengalpet.

¶29