Quashed¶18

Inspector of police v. sivakumar

Madras HC13 Oct 2025SUO MOTU TR/17808/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Speedy trial; quashing of pending STC for want of serviceable summons; futility of delayed trial; Section 4(1)(a) TN Prohibition Act; illicit possession of liquor bottles for sale without bar licence; Nagapattinam; Judicial Magistrate Court No.1; suo motu transfer; Dedicated Bench; Madras High Court; 13.10.2025; D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of S.T.C.No.513 of 2025 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam, and disposal of the suo motu transfer case; Trial Court directed to take note of the order, classify the case appropriately, consider applications such as disposal of properties, and dispatch copies of the order to all concerned. ¶18

Inspector of police Vs sivakumar — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the pending case S.T.C.No.513 of 2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam should be quashed, given the passage of time, the unserved summons and the unlikelihood of a meaningful trial.

¶16

Court's answer

Even if the accused were brought to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial; due to the passage of time a meaningful trial is unlikely and no useful purpose would be served.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

The case in STC.No.513 of 2025 of Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam stands quashed and this Suo Motu Transfer Case is disposed of.

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.), Suo Motu TR.No.17808 of 2025, decided 13.10.2025, dealt with by the Dedicated Bench pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025: the pending case S.T.C.No.513 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam — alleging, for an occurrence of the year 2023, illegal possession of 8 bottles (each 90 ml) of liquor with intention to sell without bar licence under Section 4(1)(a) TN Prohibition Act — stands quashed. Considering that, despite best efforts, the summons could not be served and that passage of time made a meaningful trial unlikely, the Court held that bringing the accused to trial would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial and serve no useful purpose. The Trial Court was directed to take note of the order, classify the case accordingly, consider applications such as disposal of properties, and communicate the order to all concerned.

¶1

Suo Motu TR.No.17808 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 13.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

Suo Motu TR.No.17808 of 2025 (S.T.C.No.513 of 2025of Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagpattinam)

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶8

ORDER

¶9

This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025.

¶10

2.The case in STC.No.513 of 2025was taken on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam for the alleged offence under Section 4 (1) (a) of TN Prohibition Act. The occurrence is of the year 2023. The allegation in this case is that the accused was found in illegal possession of 8 bottles(each 90 ml) of liquor with an intention to sell without any bar license. The same was recovered and seized. There is no previous or subsequent case against the accused.

¶11

Page No.1 of 2

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Suo Motu TR.No.17808 of 2025

¶14

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶15

3.Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the reason for absence from his usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the summons could not be served, it is evident that even if the accused is brought

¶16

to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial. Due to the passage of time, a meaningful trial is unlikely, and no useful purpose would be served.

¶17

4.Accordingly, the case in STC.No.513 of 2025 of Judicial Magistrate

¶18

Court No.1, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam, stands quashed. This Suo Motu Transfer Case is disposed of.

¶19

13.10.2025

¶20

¶21

Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned.

¶22

Suo Motu TR.No.17808 of 2025

¶23

Page No.2 of 2

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Inspector of police v. sivakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inspector of police v. sivakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inspector of Police, Erode Railway P.S Vs Thangadurai

Si of Police Vs Raja and 2 others

Si of Police, Chithode Ps Vs C. Suresh

St. Thomas Mount Police Station Vs Ravi

State Government Vs Shanmugam

Si of Police Vs Manju