Quashed

Si of Police v. Dinesh

Madras HC8 Sept 2025SUO MOTU TR/12664/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Sua Motu Transfer Case, the Madras High Court, relying on Gian Singh and the unique hybrid hearing manner of the Dedicated Bench, exercised jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings due to a compromise between parties and the death of the victim, dispensing with standard written affidavits.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in CC.76/2020 of Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham are quashed, and the Sua Motu Transfer Case is disposed of.

Si of Police Vs Dinesh — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Suo Motu TR.No.12664 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

Suo Motu TR.No.12664 of 2025

¶7

(CC.76/2020 of Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham, Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore)

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu.W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025.

¶11

This Case in Cr.No.249 of 2018 is registered for alleged offences

¶12

under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 325, 326 & 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code. It is reported that A2 died. The parties have moved on and have no objection to the case being disposed of on compromise. Due to the unique manner in which this dedicated bench conducts hybrid hearings, the filing of written affidavits or terms of compromise is dispensed with. Considering the factual matrix, the context in which the conflict arose, the background of the

¶13

Page No.1 of 2

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Suo Motu TR.No.12664 of 2025

¶16

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶17

parties, and their present position, this is an appropriate case for the exercise

¶18

of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as per

¶19

Gian Singh -vs- State of Punjab & another, (2012 10 SCC 303) .

¶20

Accordingly, the proceedings in CC.76/2020 of Judicial

¶21

Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham, Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore is quashed and

¶22

this Suo Motu Transfer Case is disposed of.

¶23

08.09.2025

¶24

veda

¶25

Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned.

¶26

Suo Motu TR.No.12664 of 2025

¶27

Page No.2 of 2

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Si of Police v. Dinesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Si of Police v. Dinesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police

S.I of Police, Konganapuram Ps Vs Ramasamy

Sub Inspector of Police Vs Balamurugan and 3 others

Inspector of police, K.N.Palayam Vs Rajamani

Vennila Vs Dhanasundhari

Si of Police Pernambut Vs Dhineshkumar