Allowed¶20

Magendran v. a.Karthik and 5 others

Madras HC15 Dec 2025SUB APPL/1371/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court order dated 15-12-2025; Sub.A.No.1371 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3856 of 2025 in W.P.No.12034 of 2025; impleadment of third party Magendran as 6th respondent in contempt petition allowed; objection by petitioner's counsel noted but overruled; applicant to place relevant facts on record; Judge: D. Bharatha Chakravarthy.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of the applicant/third party (Magendran) as the 6th respondent in Contempt Petition No.3856 of 2025 in W.P.No.12034 of 2025. ¶20

Magendran Vs a.Karthik and 5 others — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Sub.A.No.1371 of 2025 in CONT P No. 3856 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

Sub.A.No.1371 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3856 of 2025

¶7

Magendran

¶8

Applicant(s)/third party

¶9

¶10

1.A.Karthik s/o.Anbu 2.Mrs. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Singaravellan Complex, Chennai -600 001. 3.Mr. K.Karthikeyan, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gandhi Road, Puzhal, Chennai-60. 4.Mrs. Sagaya Rani, The Tahsildar, Thiruvottiyur Thaluk Office, Chennai-19. 5.Mr. K.Shankar, The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Commissionerate, Chennai -600054. 6.Mr. Chandra Mohan, The Inspector of Police, M-5, Ennore Police Station (L & O), Chennai – 600 057.

¶11

Respondents

¶12

1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Sub.A.No.1371 of 2025 in CONT P No. 3856 of 2025

¶15

Prayer: Sub Application filed to implead the applicant/third party as 6^th respondent in contempt petition No.3856 of 2025 in W.P.No.12034 of 2025.

¶16

For Applicant(s): M/s.Shaikh Mehrunnisa For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Manoharan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3

¶17

Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) for R4 and R5

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This sub application has been filed to implead the applicant/third party as 6^th respondent in Contempt Petition No.3856 of 2025 in W.P.No.12034 of 2025.

¶20

Even though the learned Counsel for the petitioner in contempt petition raised serious objection, however, considering the fact that the applicant herein has to place on record certain facts, which are relevant to the issue on hand, the Sub-Application No.1371 of 2025 stands allowed.

15-12-2025

(1/2)

veda

2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Sub.A.No.1371 of 2025 in CONT P No. 3856 of 2025