Karuppammal v. Seeni Nadar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default; failure to bring legal representatives of deceased sole respondent on record; compliance as condition precedent; Karuppammal; Murugan; Seeni Nadar (deceased); SA(MD)No.769 of 2006; S.100 CPC; AS No.38 of 2003 Subordinate Court Ambasamudram; OS No.128 of 1996 Principal District Munsif Ambasamudram; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice V. Sivagnanam; order dated 10.01.2025.
What did the court decide?
Since the appellant's Advocate did not comply with the Court's direction to take steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole Respondent (compliance being a condition precedent), the Second Appeal stands dismissed as regards the sole Respondent. ¶18