Amal v. Thainees
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal regarding a property dispute was settled between the parties through a memo filed by the first respondent. Respondents 1 and 2 were directed to give a two feet pathway to the appellant as per the memo; memo and sketch form part of the decree. Appeal disposed without costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.664 of 2008
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Judgment Reserved On Judgment Pronounced On 28.10.2024 29.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
S.A.(MD).No.664 of 2008
Amal
...Appellant
--Vs--
1.Thainees
2.Nevisha
3.The Tahsildar, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
4.The District Collector, Sivagangai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal could be disposed on the basis of a settlement memo filed by the parties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amal
- respondent
Thainees
- respondent
Nevisha
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Devakottai, Sivagangai District
- respondent
The District Collector, Sivagangai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court