Second appeal against decrees confirming plaintiffs' claim concerning temple property. Counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.01.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005 and
C.M.P(MD)No.3981 of 2018
Arulmughu Vishwanatha Swami Kovil, Kulasekaranallur, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District. Through its Trustee, Visalatchi Ramlinigam.
...1st defendant/Appellant/Appellant -Vs-
1.S.Durairaj 2.S.Dharmaraj
...Respondents 1 & 2/Respondents 1 & 2/ Plaintiffs
3.Ramakrishnan 4.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, Tuticorin -1. ...Respondents 3 & 4/Respondents 3 & 4/ Defendants 2 & 3
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.13 of 2004, dated 01.12.2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.244 of 1999, dated 18.08.2003 on the file of the Additional Munsif Court, Tuticorin.
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005
For Appellant : Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam for R1 & R2
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.13 of 2004, dated 01.12.2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.244 of 1999, dated 18.08.2003 on the file of the Additional Munsif Court, Tuticorin.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. He has filed memo to the said effect.
3.Recording the said memo, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
29.01.2025
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005
To
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005
V.SIVAGNANAM. J,
RJR
S.A.(MD)No.595 of 2005
29.01.2025
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arulmughu Vishwanatha Swami Kovil, Kulasekaranallur, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District through its Trustee, Visalatchi Ramlinigam
S.Durairaj
S.Dharmaraj
Ramakrishnan
The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, Tuticorin
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
