Second appeal against a decree in a land acquisition compensation matter was disposed of on the basis of a joint compromise memo filed by the parties, which was recorded and made part of the decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2014
The Special Tahsildar, Adi dravidar Welfare, Unit – 2, Palani.
... Appellant/Respondent
Vs.
1.Kaliyammall (Died)
2.AMuthumani (Died
3.A.Marimuthu 4.A.Mala
5Sathya Moorthi
... Respondents/Appellants
(Cause title accepted as per order dated 20.03.2014 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in S.A(MD)SR.No.40377 of 2011)
PRAYER :-
This Second Appeal is filed under Section 13 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act (Act 31/1978), to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 23.11.2009 passed in L.A.O.P.No.14 of 1997 on the file of the Sub Court, Palani.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Vinoth Government Advocate R1 & R2 : Died For R3 to R5 : Mr.R.Udhayakumar
1/4
S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014
JUDGMENT
The appellant filed this Second Appeal to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 23.11.2009 passed in L.A.O.P.No.14 of 1997 on the file of the Sub Court, Palani.
Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.04.2025
VSD
2/4
S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014
To
3/4
S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014
P.VADAMALAI, J.
VSD
JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A(MD)No.425 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2014
15.04.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Special Tahsildar, Adi dravidar Welfare, Unit – 2, Palani
Kaliyammall (Died)
A.Muthumani (Died)
A.Marimuthu
A.Mala
Sathya Moorthi
P.Vadamalai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
