Dismissed¶21

G. Yesuvadiyal v. Savariyammal

Madras HC14 Nov 2025SA(MD)/417/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed for default; no representation for appellants; appellants' counsel reported “no instructions” on 12.11.2025; listed under caption “For Dismissal”; Section 100 Civil Procedure Code; A.S.No.27 of 2022 Principal Sub Court Tirunelveli 30.01.2023; O.S.No.299 of 2019 I Additional District Munsif Court Tirunelveli 10.12.2021; no costs; connected C.M.P.(MD)No.9444 of 2023 closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice P. Vadamalai; decision date 14.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal is dismissed for default: despite the appellants' names having been printed in the cause list, none appeared for the appellants, leaving the Court with no other option. ¶21

G. Yesuvadiyal Vs Savariyammal — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.417 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : `14.11.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.417 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.9444 of 2023

1.G.Yesuvadiyal

2.G.Radhakrishnan

3.G.Manikandan

4.G.Ranjithkumar .. Appellants

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Savariyammal .. Respondent

¶13

Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.27 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli dated 30.01.2023, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.299 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli dated 10.12.2021. For Appellants : No Appearance

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.P.Muthu Vijaya Pandian

¶15

1/3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

S.A.(MD)No.417 of 2023

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

Today, this matter has been listed under the caption “For Dismissal.”

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent is present, and there is no representation for the appellants. On the earlier occasion, i.e., on 12.11.2025, the learned counsel who had been appearing for the appellants reported “no instructions” for the appellants. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to print the names of the appellants in the cause list and posted the matter for hearing today. Despite the names of the appellants having been printed in the cause list, none has appeared today.

¶21

Being left with no other option, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

14.11.2025

¶23

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mkn

¶24

2/3

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

S.A.(MD)No.417 of 2023

¶27

P. VADAMALAI, J.