Dismissed¶29

S.Shanmugiah v. M.Kurooz

Madras HC3 Jan 2025SA(MD)/340/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default of second appeal for repeated non-appearance of appellants; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; S.A.(MD)No.340 of 2004; Section 100 Civil Procedure Code; challenge to A.S.No.29 of 1993 (Sub Court, Kovilpatti, 05.01.2004) confirming O.S.No.164 of 2000 (District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti, 25.06.2002); no costs; connected C.M.P(MD)No.1726 of 2004 closed; V. Sivagnanam J.; decided 03.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on the side of the appellants, and the appellant remained absent for the second time. ¶28

S.Shanmugiah Vs M.Kurooz — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.340 of 2004

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.340 of 2004 and C.M.P(MD)No.1726 of 2004

¶7

1.S.Shanmugiah 2.A.Kalviraj

¶8

...Appellants/Appellants/Defendants

-Vs-

1.M.Kurooz

2.M.Chellathurai

3.Muthumariammal

¶13

4.Sournam

¶14

5.Anthondiammal

¶15

6.Yasammal

¶16

7.Kutti

¶17

(R4 to R7 set ex-parte given up)

¶18

...Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶19

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.29 of 1993, dated 05.01.2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.164 of 2000, dated 25.06.2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti.

¶20

For Appellants : No appearance

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan for R1 to R6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Page 1 of 4

¶24

S.A.(MD)No.340 of 2004

¶25

JUDGMENT

¶26

This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.29 of 1993, dated 05.01.2004 on the file of the Sub Court,

¶27

Kovilpatti, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.164 of 2000, dated 25.06.2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti.

¶28

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellants. The appellant remained absent for the second time.

¶29

3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶30

03.01.2025

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Page 2 of 4

¶34

S.A.(MD)No.340 of 2004