Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a title suit. The sole appellant had died and no legal representative steps were taken within limitation, so the appeal was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.301 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.301 of 2004
Rajalakshmi Ammal
...Defendant/Appellant/Appellant
-Vs-
R.M.A.Shanmugasundaram ...Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur as confirmed the judgment and decree dated 08.03.2001 passed in O.S.No.74 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Chandrasekar
For Respondent : Mr.K.Vaithialingam
Page 1 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.301 of 2004
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur as confirmed the judgment and decree dated 08.03.2001 passed in O.S.No.74 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur.
costs.
02.01.2025
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
Page 2 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.301 of 2004
V.SIVAGNANAM. J,
RJR
To
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.(MD)No.301 of 2004
02.01.2025
Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajalakshmi Ammal
R.M.A.Shanmugasundaram
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
