Registry direction on a 'being mentioned' motion to correct an inadvertent omission of the word 'each' in paragraph 20.1 of the order dated 15.04.2025 in S.A(MD) No.1 of 2018, clarifying the plaintiffs' coparcener and settlee shares.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD) No.1 of 2018 K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.
The case is posted under the caption for “being mentioned”
that there is an inadvertent mistake in the order in S.A(MD) No.1 of 2018 dated 15.04.2025 in Paragraph No.20.1 and there was inadvertent omission of the word “each”.
“ 20.1.The plaintiffs are entitled to 1/16th share as coparcener “each” and 1/8th share “each” as settlee in the first item of the suit schedule property.
concerned with both the above finding. Hence, the Registry is directed to incorporate the order dated 15.04.2025 in S.A.No.1 of 2018 in paragraph No.20.1 as follows and issue a fresh order copy to the learned counsel for the appellants.
“20.1.The plaintiffs are entitled to 1/16th share as coparcener
“each” and 1/8th share “each” as settlee in the first item of the suit schedule property.”
17.04.2026
ebsi
1/2
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.
ebsi
S.A(MD) No.1 of 2018
17.04.2026
2/2
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
