R.Kumaravel v. Venkatesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; Second Appeal SA No. 678 of 2015; Section 100 CPC; A.S.No.59 of 2012; V Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore; O.S.No.2071 of 2005; II Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore; appellant R.Kumaravel; respondents Venkatesan, V.Vivekanandan, Smt.Vidya, Commissioner Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation; Avinashi Road, Coimbatore property; SARFAESI Proceedings purchase during pendency; counsel endorsement; appeal dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; video conference appearance; P. Dhanabal J.; judgment dated 17-12-2025; smn; Index/Speaking/Internet/Neutral Citation flags left as printed template.
What did the court decide?
Recording the learned counsel's submission and the endorsement made on behalf of the appellant that the appellant had purchased the property through SARFAESI Proceedings during the pendency of the appeal, the Court held the prayer sought in the Second Appeal to be infructuous and dismissed the Second Appeal as infructuous, with no order as to costs.