Second appeals and civil revision arising from property suits were listed for dismissal after repeated non-appearance by the appellant. The court dismissed both second appeals and the revision petition for default, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.Nos.604 & 678 of 2003 and
C.R.P.NPD.No.1136 of 2003
S.A.Nos.604 of 2003
D.Peter
...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
Vs.
1.N.Kuppusamy Chettiar (died)
...Defendant/Respondent/Respondent
2.K.Padmavathi 3.K.Nagaraj
4.K.Ranganathan
5.K.Balasubramaniam
(R2 to R5 are brought on record as LR's of the deceased sole respondent as per order of Court dated 25.10.2005, made in CMPNos.19079 & 19080 of 2003)
...Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgement and decree dated 29.01.2003, passed in A.S.No. 111 of 1996, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Palani, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 09.11.1995, passed in O.S.No.790 of 1988, by the learned district Munsif, Palani.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : M/s.R.Subramanian
1/4
S.A.Nos.678 of 2003 D.Peter ...Defendant/Appellant/Appellant Vs. 1.N.Kuppusamy Chettiar (deceased) ...Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent 2.K.Padmavathi 3.K.Nagaraj 4.K.Ranganathan 5.K.Balasubramaniam (R2 to R5 are brought on record as LR of the deceased sole respondent Vide order of Court dated 27.01.2004, made in CMPNos.16320 & 16321 of 2003) ...Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgement and decree dated 29.01.2003, passed in A.S.No. 112 of 1996, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Palani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.11.1995, passed in O.S.No.160 of 1988, by the learned District Munsif, Palani.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.R.Subramanian * * * * *
C.R.P.NPD.No.1136 of 2003 D.Peter ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
N.Kuppusamy Chettiar ...Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
2/4
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgement and decree dated 29.01.2003, passed in I.A.No.105 of 2002, in A.S.No.111 of 1996, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Palani.
For Appellant : No appearance
COMMON JUDGMENT
These two Second Appeals and Civil Revision Petition were listed on 01.07.2025. There was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, it is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant.
2.Accordingly, both the Second Appeals and Civil Revision Petition
stand dismissed for default. No costs.
02.07.2025
NCC: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No RJR
3/4
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
RJR
To
Copy to:- The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.Nos.604 & 678 of 2003 and C.R.P.NPD.No.1136 of 2003
02.07.2025
4/4
2 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Peter
N.Kuppusamy Chettiar (died)
K.Padmavathi
K.Nagaraj
K.Ranganathan
K.Balasubramaniam
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
