Anandhan v. Kunni @ Rajammal(died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal S.A.No. 594 of 2007; correction/mention order dated 30.07.2025 by T.V. Thamilselvi, J.; rectifies clerical error in the concluding portion (para 15, page 12) of the order dated 12.03.2025, which had recorded the Second Appeal as dismissed instead of allowed; corrected outcome: findings of first appellate court set aside, findings of trial court confirmed, Second Appeal allowed, no order as to costs, connected Miscellaneous Petition closed; Registry to issue fresh order copy. Keywords: second appeal, correction, erratum, mention, Registry, fresh order copy, no costs. Court identified as Madras High Court by inference from the official judis URL (https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis).
What did the court decide?
Correction allowed: Registry directed to substitute the erroneous concluding portion (para 15, page 12) of the order dated 12.03.2025 so that it records that the findings of the first appellate court are set aside, the findings of the trial court are confirmed, the Second Appeal is allowed, with no order as to costs and the connected Miscellaneous Petition closed; the correction is to be incorporated in the order dated 12.03.2025 and a fresh order copy issued to the appellant.