Second appeals were dismissed for default as the counsel for the appellants could not obtain instructions regarding deceased appellants despite previous opportunities granted by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.09.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
S.A.Nos. 550 and 554 of 2019
... Appellants in both the Appeals
Vs.
Angamuthu ... Respondent in S.A.No.554/19
Prayer in S.A.No.550/2019: The Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, dated 27.02.2009 in A.S.No.72 of 2008 partly
1/4
S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019
allowing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Perambalur, dated 31.01.2006, in O.S.No.21 of 2004.
Prayer in S.A.No.554/2019: The Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, dated 27.02.2009 in A.S.No.28 of 2008 partly allowing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Perambalur, dated 31.01.2006, in O.S.No.184 of 2003
For Appellants : Mr.P.Aswin Karthik for M/s.P.Valliappan - in both the Appeals For Respondents : Mr.Navaneethakrishnan for Mr.S.Kamadevan for R1 in S.A.No.550/19 and respondent in S.A.No.554/2019 *****
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter is called for hearing, it is reported by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants 1, 4 and 5 died and in
spite of his best efforts, he was not able to get any instructions in this regard.
2/4
S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019
to the learned counsel for the appellants for taking steps for the deceased
appellants and finally the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he could not get instructions with regard to the deceased appellants.
There shall be no order as to costs.
09.09.2025
cgi Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
To:
K. RAJASEKAR, J.
cgi
3/4
S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019
S.A.Nos. 550 and 554 of 2019
09.09.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Velayutham
Subramani
Raju
Annadurai
Raja
Angamuthu
K. RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
