Dismissed¶41

V.Markandan v. Lakshmi

Madras HC11 Nov 2025SA/164/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no appearance either side; counsel reported no instructions; notice served on second appellant of no use; connected MP closed; S.A. under Section 100 CPC; confirms Subordinate Court Ranipet A.S.Nos.40 & 41 of 2007 decrees dated 10.04.2008 affirming District Munsif Sholinghur O.S.Nos.102 of 1999 & 158 of 2002 decrees dated 29.12.2006; Madras High Court; Dr.R.N.MANJULA, J.; decided 11-11-2025.

What did the court decide?

Both Second Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution: there was no representation for either side when the matter was called, the appellants' learned counsel had earlier reported no instructions, and notice issued by the registry despite service on the second appellant was of no use. ¶41

V.Markandan Vs Lakshmi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-11-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

S.A Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009

¶7

1. V.Markandan

¶8

S/o. Varadappa Naidu, Othaivadai Street, Ayarpadi Village And Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore Dist.

¶9

2.V.Pazhani

¶10

S/o. Vadivel Naicker, Road Street, Ayarpadi Village And Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore Dist

¶11

Appellant(s) in both appeals

¶12

¶13

1. LAKSHMI

¶14

W/o. Perumal Naicker, 54, East Raja Street, Big Kancheepuram And Post, Kancheepuram.

¶15

2.BOOPATHI

¶16

S/o. Chandran, 54, East Raja Street, Big Kancheepuram And Post, Kancheepuram.

¶17

3.SELVI

¶18

W/o. Ramalingam, 54/a, East Raja

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009

¶21

Street, Kancheepuram Dist.

¶22

4.SHANKAR

¶23

S/o. Perumal Naicker, 54/a, East Raja Street, Kancheepuram Dist.

¶24

5.SHANTHA

¶25

S/o. Perumal Naicker, 54/a, East Raja Street, Kancheepuram Dist.

¶26

Respondent(s) in S.A.No.164 of 2009

¶27

LAKSHMI, W/o.Perumal Naicker

¶28

2.SHANKAR, S/o. Perumal Naicker

¶29

All are residing at 54/A, East Raja Street, Big Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram.

¶30

Respondent[s] in S.A.No.165 of 2009

¶31

PRAYER : Appeals filed under 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 10.04.2008 made in A.S.Nos.40 and 41 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ranipet, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2006 made in O.S.Nos.102 of 1999 and 158 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sholinghur.

¶32

For Appellant(s): No Appearance [in both appeals]

¶33

For Respondent(s): No Appearance [in both appeals]

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009

¶36

ORDER

¶37

These Second Appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and

¶38

decree dated 10.04.2008 made in A.S.Nos.40 and 41 of 2007 on the file of the

¶39

Subordinate Court, Ranipet, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2006 made in O.S.Nos.102 of 1999 and 158 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sholinghur.

¶40

When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation for both

¶41

sides. In the earlier occasion, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants reported no instructions and the notice issued from the registry is of no use, despite the same has been served on the second appellant. Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶42

11-11-2025

¶43

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No vrc

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009

¶46

¶47