Doraisamy Gounder,(died) v. Perumal Gounder,(died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC; S.A.Nos.1384 & 1385/2011; MP.Nos.1 & 1/2014; Justice R.N.Manjula; 09.01.2025; Section 100 CPC second appeals REJECTED (dismissed), no costs. Suit OS.181/1999 (permanent injunction over S.No.650/4 & 650/5, 1.01.5 acres) decreed; counter-suit OS.184/1999 (declaration + injunction for alleged cart track/pathway through S.No.650/1 to S.No.499/2A) dismissed; confirmed by Sub Court, Attur (A.S.Nos.11 & 12/2002, 30.07.2004). Findings: VAO evidence corroborated by Commissioner's report (Ex.C1/C2); defendants claim nothing over S.Nos.650/4–650/5; no irregularity/illegality in courts below; no substantial question of law. Parties: Doraisamy Gounder, Lakshmana Gounder, Ayyamperumal Gounder, Lakshmi, Jayabal, Sampath Kumar, Saroja, Palaniappan, Raja v. Perumal Gounder, Kaliammal, Pichammal, Vijaya, Rani, Govindan. Advocates: T.Murga Manickam (Sr. Counsel) & Zeenath Begum for appellants; P.Jagadeesan for RR3–R6.