Dismissed¶29

K.V. Kolanchi v. P. Rukmani

Madras HC6 Jun 2025SA/1134/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal S.A.No.1134 of 2012, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 06.06.2025 by Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup J; dismissed as withdrawn on a recorded settlement memo (subject matter of the Appeal partitioned); impugned decision: Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2011 in A.S.No.78 of 2010 (Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court – III, Vridhachalam) modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2010 in O.S.No.97 of 2005 (Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam); filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code; no order as to Court fee; no merits decided, no cases cited. Appellants: K.V.Kolanchi, N.Rajeshwari, S.Lakshmi (counsel Mr.T.S.Baskaran). Respondents: P.Rukmani, Mrs.M.Rajalakshmi, P.Santhana Krishnan, K.V.Ramalingam (died), K.V.Ragupathy, K.V.R.Vasantha Ramalingam, K.V.R.Jayachandran, K.V.R.Babu, K.V.R.Sridharan, R.Vani @ Sraswathi.

K.V. Kolanchi Vs P. Rukmani — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.1134 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06.06.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶6

S.A.No.1134 of 2012

¶7

K.V.Kolanchi 2. N.Rajeshwari 3. S.Lakshmi .. Appellants

¶8

Vs.

¶9

P.Rukmani

¶10

Mrs.M.Rajalakshmi

¶11

P.Santhana Krishnan

¶12

K.V.Ramalingam (died) 4. K.V.Ragupathy

¶13

K.V.R.Vasantha Ramalingam

¶14

K.V.R.Jayachandran

¶15

Page 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

S.A.No.1134 of 2012

¶18

K.V.R.Babu

¶19

K.V.R.Sridharan

¶20

R.Vani @ Sraswathi ...Respondents

¶21

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court – III), Vridhachalam in A.S.No.78 of 2010, modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2010 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam in O.S.No.97 of 2005.

¶22

For Appellants : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent : No Appearance for R-1 to R-3 & R-5 to R-9 Died - R-4

¶23

J U D G M E N T

¶24

This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court – III), Vridhachalam in A.S.No.78 of 2010, modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2010 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam in O.S.No.97 of 2005.

¶25

Page 2 of 5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

S.A.No.1134 of 2012

¶28

The learned Counsel for the Appellants filed a memo stating that the parties to the Second Appeal had settled the dispute among themselves, since the subject matter of the Appeal is partitioned. Therefore, they had withdrawn the Appeal. The memo filed to that effect and the memo is recorded.

¶29

In the result, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn . No order as to Court fee.

06.06.2025