Disposed¶35

The Registrar v. K. Vijayakumar

Madras HC27 Nov 2025REV.APPL/105/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Annamalai University; Registrar; review application; Order XLVII Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C.; Section 114 C.P.C.; contempt petition disposal; CAS promotion; Professor; enquiry committee report; writ appeals batch of 2022; Madras High Court; disposed without costs; 27.11.2025; S.M. Subramaniam; Mohammed Shaffiq.

What did the court decide?

All Review Applications and Contempt Petitions disposed of; no further adjudication; no costs awarded. ¶35

The Registrar Vs K. Vijayakumar — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Rev.A.No.105 of 2024 etc. batch IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 27.11.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Review Application Nos.105 to 123 of 2024

¶7

and

¶8

Review Application Nos.125 to 151 of 2024

¶9

and

¶10

Review Application Nos 155 to 168 & 183 of 2024

¶11

and

¶12

Contempt Petition Nos.165 to 206 & 237 to 255 of 2024

¶13

Review Application No.105 of 2025

¶14

The Registrar, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram – 608 002. Cuddalore District. ..Applicant Vs.

¶15

Dr.K.Vijaykumar, S/o Kuppusamy, Department of Library and Information Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District – 608 002. ..Respondent

¶16

PRAYER: Review Applications filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C.

¶17

read with Section 114 of C.P.C. against the common judgment made in Writ Page 1 of 5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Rev.A.No.105 of 2024 etc. batch Appeal Nos. 1807, 1808, 1809, 1811, 1812, 1813, 1814, 1815, 1816, 1817, 1819, 2004, 2005, 2011, 2013, 2087, 2088, 2089, 2090, 2091, 2092, 2093, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2097, 2098, 2099, 2100, 2101, 2102, 2103, 2104, 2105, 2106, 2107, 2108, 2109, 2110, 2111, 2112, 2113, 2114, 2115, 2116, 2117, 2118, 2120, 2121, 2122, 2123, 2124, 2125, 2426, 2427, 2428, 2429, 2430, 2431, 2432 and 2440 of 2022 dated 13.07.2023 passed by this Court.

¶20

For Applicants in all the Rev.Applns. : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.Nambi Aroon

¶21

For Respondents

¶22

in Rev.A.Nos.105 to 109, 114, to 116, 118 to 123, 125, 126, 128, 129, 131, 132, 134, 136, 138 to 141, 143, 144, 146, 147, 149, 151, 155, 156, 165, 167, 168, 159, 160, 161,163 /2024 : Mrs.Dakshini Reddy, Senior Counsel for Mrs.S.Suneetha

¶23

For Respondents in Rev.A.Nos.110, 111, 113, 117, 127, 130, 133, 135, 137, 142, 145, 148, 150, 164, 166, 183, 157, 158, 162/2024 : Mr.M.Velmurugan

¶24

For Respondents in Rev.A.Nos.112/2024 : : Mr.S.P.Harikrishnan for M/s.Vijayan Associates

¶25

For Petitioner in

¶26

Page 2 of 5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Cont.P.Nos.165 to 192, 194 to 206 of 2024	Rev.A.No.105 of 2024 etc. batch : Mrs.Dakshini Reddy, Senior Counsel for Mrs.S.Suneetha
For Petitioner in Cont.P.No.193 of 2024	: Mr.S.P.Harikrishnan for M/s.Vijayan Associates
For Petitioner in Cont.P.No.237 to 255 of 2024	: Mr.M.Velmurugan
For Respondents in all the Cont.Petitions	: Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.Nambi Aroon

¶29

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

¶30

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

¶31

The respective learned Senior Counsel and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents as well as the learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the review applicants would submit that in pursuant to the order of this Court, enquiry committee completed the enquiry and submitted its report. This Court, passed an order, directing the University to consider the claim of the writ petitioners for further promotion to the post of Professor under the CAS and pass necessary orders within a period of three months. Since the enquiry

¶32

Page 3 of 5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Rev.A.No.105 of 2024 etc. batch committee submitted its report and the eligible persons are identified, the process commenced may be concluded as per the submissions made by the learned Additional Advocate General.

¶35

Regarding the Contempt Petitions, it is brought to the notice of this Court that since the order had been implemented, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken. Consequently, all the Review Applications and the Contempt Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

27-11-2025

vsi

Page 4 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

Rev.A.No.105 of 2024 etc. batch

¶41

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J. Vsi Review Application Nos.105 to 123 of 2024 and Review Application Nos.125 to 151 of 2024 and Review Application Nos 155 to 168 & 183 of 2024 and Contempt Petition Nos.165 to 206 & 237 to 255 of 2024

¶42

27.11.2025

¶43

Page 5 of 5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Registrar v. K. Vijayakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Registrar v. K. Vijayakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K.Enterprises, Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)

The Inspector General of Registration Vs Prema Ranjithkumar

Sri Bala Nanda Educational Trust, Vs Balaji Radhakrishnan

Pushpawathie Narendra, Liquidator Vs The Secretary

M.S.Krishna Kumar Vs Union of India

Paraman Vs the Sub Registrar