Dismissed¶23

Poomari v. the District Collector

Madras HC18 Jul 2025REV.APLW(MD)/38/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition dismissed; Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 C.P.C.; merits-based grounds not re-adjudicable; Writ Court already adjudicated issues on merits; seeks review of order dated 29.11.2010 in W.P.(MD)No.11268 of 2009; petitioner Poomari; respondents District Collector Virudhunagar, Additional Director of Panchayat, Block Development Officer and Extension Officer Rajapalayam Union, P.Alagapuriyan; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; decided 18.07.2025; no costs; S.M.Subramaniam J.; Dr.A.D.Maria Clete J.

What did the court decide?

Grounds relating to merits raised in a Review Petition cannot be re-adjudicated; where the Writ Court has already adjudicated the issues on merits, the Review Petition is not entertainable. ¶23

Poomari Vs the District Collector — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

REV.APLW.(MD)No.38 of 2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶7

REV.APLW.(MD)No.38 of 2011

Poomari

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶12

2.The Additional Director of Panchayat, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

3.The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Rajapalayam Union, Virudhunagar District.

¶14

4.The Extension Officer, Rajapalayam Union, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

¶15

5.P.Alagapuriyan ...Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

REV.APLW.(MD)No.38 of 2011

¶19

PRAYER: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the order dated 29.11.2010 passed in W.P.(MD)No.11268 of 2009 by this Court.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Meenakshi Babu, for Mrs.J.Anandavalli For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. )

¶23

This Review Petition has been filed raising grounds relating to merits, which cannot be re-adjudicated. The Writ Court has already adjudicated the issues on merits. That being so, this Review Petition is not entertainable and therefore, the same stands dismissed. No costs.

¶24

(S.M.S., J.) & (A.D.M.C., J.) 18.07.2025

¶25

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

¶26

Yuva

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

REV.APLW.(MD)No.38 of 2011