Dismissed

The Special Commissioner, v. P. Parthiban(died)

Madras HC16 Dec 2025REV.APLC(MD)/135/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

State authorities filed a review application under Order XLVII Rule 1 and Section 114 CPC against a Division Bench order in a writ appeal. Counsel for the State informed the Court the review was not pressed. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the review as not pressed without costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

The Special Commissioner, Vs P. Parthiban(died) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

1 REV.APLC.(MD)No.135 OF 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI

¶8

REV.APLC(MD)No.135 of 2021 in W.A.(MD)No.1225 of 2018 & C.M.P.(MD)No.9330 of 2021

¶9

The Special Commissioner /

¶10

Revenue Administrative Officer, Natural Calamity Management cum Audit Department,

¶11

Chennai.

¶12

The District Collector, Collectorate,

¶13

Madurai.

¶14

The Administrative Officer, District Agriculture Engineering Department, Madurai District,

¶15

Madurai.

¶16

The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Petitioners / Appellants

¶17

Vs.

¶18

P.Parthiban(died)

¶19

Vairamani

¶20

Kesavan

¶21

Karpaga Jothi

¶22

(Respondents 2 to 4 / LRs of the deceased sole respondent are substituted vide

¶23

order dated 20.11.2025 made in C.M.P.(MD)No.18501 of 2025)

¶24

... Respondents / Respondents

¶25

1/3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2 REV.APLC.(MD)No.135 OF 2021

¶28

Prayer: Review application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 &2 CPC. r/w. u/s.114 CPC., to review the writ appeal order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench vide order dated 22.06.2021 in W.A.(MD) No.1225 of 2018 against W.P.(MD)No.8581 of 2018 on the file of this Court and set aside the same.

¶29

For Petitioners : Mr.S.S.Madhavan, Special Government Pleader.

¶30

¶31

J U D G M E N T

¶32

The learned Special Government Pleader informed the Court

¶33

that this review application can be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the same, this review petition is dismissed as not pressed. No

¶34

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶35

(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.KALAIMATHI, J.)

¶36

16^th December 2025

¶37

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶38

PMU

¶39

2/3

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

3 REV.APLC.(MD)No.135 OF 2021

¶42

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

AND

R.KALAIMATHI, J.

PMU

REV.APLC(MD)No.135 of 2021 in W.A.(MD)No.1225 of 2018

¶47

16.12.2025

¶48

3/3

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Special Commissioner, v. P. Parthiban(died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

The Special Commissioner, v. P. Parthiban(died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Vedanta Limited Vs Union of India

R.Ayyapillai Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., Vs Union of India

G.Gururajan Vs The Commissioner

M.Mathuresan Vs the Commissioner

G.Mythili Vs The Commissioner