Subodh Kumar Bhutoria Vs Vinod Kumar Bhutoria

Vinod Kumar Bhutoria S/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, No.123-125, Block 3-6D, Arihant Vaikunt Apartment, Bricklin Road, Purasaivakkam, Chennai - 600 007.

¶11

2.Mrs.Gyanendri Gupta W/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, No.41/19, E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Rundalls Avenue, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶12

3.Mrs.Alka Bachhawat D/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, 175A, Motilal Nehru Road, Sarat Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 029. ... Respondent No.1 to 3 / Defendants No.1 to 3

¶13

PRAYER:- To appoint the 1^st respondent/1^st defendant as party receiver to manage and maintain the suit schedule mentioned properties in above Page No.1/7

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

O.A.No. 844 of 2024 in C.S.No.166 of 2023

¶16

C.S.No.166 of 2023.

¶17

For Applicant : M/s.G.Vijayakumar For R1 : No Appearance For R2 : Mr.M.Vijayanand For R3 : Mr.Bhagavath Krishnan

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff to appoint the 1^st respondent/1^st defendant as party receiver to manage and maintain the suit schedule mentioned properties.

¶20

According to the applicant, originally the suit schedule mentioned properties belonged to his father late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, who also made various investments in various banks and had jewels in the lockers maintained in various banks. The father of the applicant died intestate on 18.08.2022, leaving behind the 1^st respondent, 2^nd respondent / 2^nd wife, 3^rd respondent and plaintiff as his legal heirs to succeed his estate. The deceased father of the applicant has also left various deposit amounts and jewels in lockers in the following Banks:-

¶21

i) The Cosmos Co-operative Bank, Vepery Branch

¶22

ii) Jana Small Finance Bank, Purasawalkam Branch iii) Equitas Small Finance Bank, Millars Road Branch

¶23

iv) The Chief Post Master GPO

¶24

v) IDFC First Bank Vepery (Kilpauk) vi) Kotak Mahindra Bank Vepery Branch vii) State Bank of India Vepery Branch

¶25

viii) Axis Bank Vepery Branch

¶26

Page No.2/7

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

O.A.No. 844 of 2024 in C.S.No.166 of 2023

¶29

Apart from those Bank accounts, he lend money to third parties and had share certificates, jewels, diamonds and silver articles, which were within the knowledge of the respondents 1 to 3. The applicant is entitled to 1/4^th share over the schedule mentioned properties. The applicant reliably understand that some of the respondents/defendants have withdrawn certain deposits, collecting rents from the schedule mentioned properties and also recovered loans from various borrowers. The above said funds recovered and and withdrawn are also to be shared equally by all the legal heirs. Further, the respondents/defendants are also trying to open the bank locker and requested the Bank Manager to close the fixed deposits made in the name of his father, in which the applicant also entitled to 1/4^th share. There are certain tenants in the Schedule Item No.1 property and some of the bank accounts and lockers are yet to be verified with respect to the contents in the lockers and balance in the accounts. To avoid pilferage and mismanagement, a party receiver may be appointed to take care of all schedule mentioned properties during the pendency of the above suit. Therefore, he filed this application.

¶30

The 3^rd respondent has filed counter by denying the averments made in the affidavit. The mother of the 3^rd defendant died in the year 1997. In the year 2002, his father informed that he intends to marry the 2^nd respondent and the 2^nd respondent is also lived with his father for several years. In the mean time, his father died on 18.08.2022. A third party has to be appointed to manage and maintain the schedule mentioned properties and not a party receiver. Since the applicant is one of the party, a third party is necessary. The 3^rd respondent also entitled to 1/4^th share over the properties. The 3^rd respondent has not recovered loans from any borrowers. Therefore, the petition has to be dismissed in respect of appointment of the party receiver.

¶31

Page No.3/7

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

O.A.No. 844 of 2024 in C.S.No.166 of 2023

¶34

The 2^nd respondent also denied the petition averments and according to her, she is the 2^nd wife of the deceased Kesarichand Bhutoria and the separate properties of the 2^nd respondent also included in this litigation. There are no tenants in the buildings and the buildings are not in a condition to occupy by the tenants and only to harass the 2^nd respondent the suit is filed and the suit itself is not maintainable and appointment of party receiver is not necessary.

¶35

6. This Court heard both sides and perused the records.

¶36

The applicant, who is the plaintiff in the suit has filed this application to appoint the 1^st respondent / 1^st defendant as party receiver to manage and maintain the suit schedule properties. The respondents have stoutly denied the averments made in the affidavit and also strongly opposed to appoint party receiver. Learned counsel for the 3^rd respondent has no objection to appoint a third party receiver and after elaborate arguments, learned counsel appearing for the 2^nd respondent also agreed for appointment of the Commissioner to take inventory, to note down the physical features of the properties and to collect the particulars of tenants and rent particulars. The 2^nd respondent's objection is that the properties are not in a condition for usage and no any rental income has been received from the tenants. Therefore, in view of the above said submissions made by both side counsels and in order to avoid the multiplicity of proceedings and in the interest of justice, it is appropriate to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to take inventory and to find out the occupation of the tenants and the rents paid by the tenants in respect of the properties. The rights and entitlement of the properties over the properties can be decided in the main

¶37

Page No.4/7

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

O.A.No. 844 of 2024 in C.S.No.166 of 2023

¶40

suit. This application is filed only for taking inventory and to find out the existence of the buildings and other valuable properties. In view of the same, this Original Application is allowed.

¶41

R.Sumithra, Advocate (M.S.1573 / 1999) 9841958626, is appointed as Advocate Commissioner to take inventories of the movable properties and to note down the physical features, occupancy of the tenants in the buildings and the condition of the buildings. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to submit a report.

¶42

Post the matter on 07.01.2026.

04-12-2025

Mac

To

Vinod Kumar Bhutoria S/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, No.123-125, Block 3-6D, Arihant Vaikunt Apartment, Bricklin Road, Purasaivakkam, Chennai - 600 007.

¶47

2.Mrs.Gyanendri Gupta W/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, No.41/19, E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Page No.5/7

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

O.A.No. 844 of 2024 in C.S.No.166 of 2023

¶50

Rundalls Avenue, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶51

3.Mrs.Alka Bachhawat D/o.Late Mr.Kesarichand Bhutoria, 175A, Motilal Nehru Road, Sarat Bose Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 029.

¶52

P. DHANABAL, J.