Dismissed¶9
M/S.Harita Finance Ltd. v. M/S.Impressive Touchwood
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 9 – interim measures – application filed in 2003
Madras HCOA/8/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single-judge Madras HC order dated 01.04.2025 (O.A.No.8 of 2003, Justice Abdul Quddhose): M/s.Harita Finance Ltd.'s 2003 application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against M/s.Impressive Touchwood Drafts Ltd. and others dismissed as infructuous, on the inference that an Arbitral Award may by now have been passed; no representation on either side.
What did the court decide?
Since it is possible that an Arbitral Award could by now have been passed, the Section 9 application filed in 2003 is inferred to have become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. ¶9