Dismissed¶23

Pandian v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC26 Mar 2025HCP(MD)/366/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

habeas corpus; dismissed as withdrawn; permission to withdraw; Article 226; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; H.C.P(MD)No.366 of 2025; detenue P.Pavithra; petitioner Pandian (husband); Thuvakudi Police Station; Crime No.82 of 2025; Trichy/Tirchy District; Vibha Medcare, Namakkal; inpatient treatment; Additional Public Prosecutor E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar; counsel S.C.Herold Singh; Dr. G. Jayachandran J.; R. Poornima J.; 26.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Habeas Corpus Petition; the substantive prayer to produce the detenue and set her at liberty was not adjudicated. ¶23

Pandian Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED :26 .03.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶6

H.C.P(MD)No.366 of 2025

¶7

Pandian ... Petitioner/Husband of the detenue

¶8

.Vs.

¶9

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Tirchy District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuvakudi Police Station, Trichy District (Crime No.82 of 2025) ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the detenue P.Pavithra, aged about 20 years, wife of Pandiyan(the Petitioner herein) before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶12

1/5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar 1 and 2 Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J AND R.POORNIMA.,J

¶17

Habeas Corpus Petition filed by the husband seeking issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to bring the person or body of the detenue P.Pavithra, aged about 20 years, wife of Pandiyan(the Petitioner herein) before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶19

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2/State states that the said Pavithra was admitted in a private hospital at Namakkal for treatment as inpatient and the same has also been informed to the petitioner.The medical

¶20

2/5

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

records issued by Vibha Medcare, Namakkal was conveyed to the Petitioner, after filing of the Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Habeas Corpus Petition. Permission is granted.

¶23