Dismissed¶31

V.P.Parameswari v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its, Secretary to Government

Madras HC17 Jul 2025HCP/862/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court habeas corpus petition (H.C.P.No.862 of 2025, decided 17.07.2025) dismissed as infructuous; challenge to preventive detention order RC.No.C2/17/2025 dated 11.04.2025 passed under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982; detention order revoked by G.O.Rt.No.2811 dated 19.05.2025; detenu Manikandan confined in Central Prison, Cuddalore; petitioner V.P.Parameswari; counsel K.Karthik (petitioner) and E.Raj Thilak, Additional Public Prosecutor (respondents); bench M.S. Ramesh, J. and V. Lakshminarayanan, J.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of counsel for both sides, supported by Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.2811, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XIV) Department, dated 19.05.2025, that the detention order had already been revoked, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. ¶31

V.P.Parameswari Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

H.C.P.No.862 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.07.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

H.C.P.No.862 of 2025

V.P.Parameswari

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009

¶13

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate Villupuram District Villupuram

¶14

3.The Superintendent of Police Villupuram District Villupuram

¶15

4.The Inspector of Police Roshanai Police Station Villupuram District Villupuram

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

H.C.P.No.862 of 2025

¶19

5.The Superintendent Central Prison Cuddalore

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records relating to detention order in RC.No.C2/17/2025, dated 11.04.2025 passed by the second respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner's son Manikandan, the detenu, now confined in Central Prison, Cuddalore before this Court and set him at liberty.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karthik For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

¶23

ORDER

¶24

M.S.RAMESH, J. AND

¶25

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶26

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.2811, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XIV) Department, dated 19.05.2025, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.

¶27

Page 2 of 4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

H.C.P.No.862 of 2025

¶30