Manjula v. the State Rep by, the Superintendetn of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court habeas corpus withdrawal; HCP 478 of 2025; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of habeas corpus; petitioner Manjula; daughter Nathiya aged 30; alleged illegal custody of private 4th respondent Vinayamoorthi; State respondents Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police H4 Thiruvennainallur Police Station, Villupuram District; counsel B. Boopathy for V. Prathaban; Additional Public Prosecutor R. Muniyapparaj assisted by M. Sylvestor John; counsel endorsement and leave to withdraw; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; no substantive ruling on detention or custody.
What did the court decide?
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn; no costs. ¶28