Dismissed¶27

C.Prema Raju v. C.R.Gayathri

Madras HC11 Aug 2025CS/43/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; CS No. 43 of 2023; O.A.No.144 of 2023; K. Kumaresh Babu J.; decided 11-08-2025; plaint rejected; suit dismissed; Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C.; order in A.No.2143 of 2023 set aside by allowed intra-court appeal; plaint amended per order dated 02.11.2023 in A.No.3855 of 2023; declaration sought that Settlement Deed dated 11th September 2014 (Document No.3948/2014, SRO Anna Nagar) be null and void on ground of fraud; plaintiff C.Prema Raju; defendants C.R.Gayathri and A.C.Raju; counsel M/s.Anirudh A Sriram for defendants; no appearance for plaintiff; no order as to costs; connected application closed.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the plaintiff: the plaint in C.S.No.43 of 2023 stands rejected; no order as to costs; connected application (identified as O.A.No.144 of 2023 from the cause title) closed. ¶27

C.Prema Raju Vs C.R.Gayathri — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CS No. 43 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-08-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

CS No. 43 of 2023 and

¶7

O.A.No.144 of 2023

¶8

C.Prema Raju W/o.Mr.A.C.Raju, 3rd Floor, No.31/3, (4/3), Q-Block, Plot No.3721, VI Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

Plaintiff(s)

1.Ms.C.R.Gayathri

D/o.Mr.A.C.Raju, Plot No.4206, New No.8, T-Block, 8th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

¶13

2.Mr.A.C.Raju

¶14

S/o.AChinna Raju, New No.8, Plot No.4206, T-Block, 8th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

¶15

Defendant(s)

¶16

PRAYER

¶17

Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare the Settlement Deed dated 11th September 2014 registered as Document No.3948/2014 before the SRO Anna Nagar executed by the plaintiff with

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CS No. 43 of 2023

¶20

respect to her half share in Schedule 'A' mentioned property which is detailed in Schedule – B has a result of the fraud played upon her by the defendants here in as null and void.(Amended as per order dated 02.11.2023 in A.No.3855 of 2023)

¶21

For Plaintiff(s): No appearance

¶22

For Defendant(s): M/s.Anirudh A Sriram

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

In view of the fact that the intra-court appeal filed against the order made

¶25

in A.No.2143 of 2023 in the instant suit had been allowed, by setting aside the

¶26

order passed by this Court passed under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C., the plaint