Dismissed¶23

N. Baskar v. T.N.Rangesh

Madras HC21 Jul 2025CS/231/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Partition suit (C.S.No.231 of 2024, Madras High Court, K. Kumaresh Babu J., 21.07.2025) by N. Baskar against T. N. Rangesh with connected O.A.Nos.713 & 714 of 2024; relief sought: partition into two equal half shares by metes and bounds plus permanent injunctions against alienation, encumbrance, leasing and alteration of physical features; suit dismissed as withdrawn following out-of-court settlement; Registry directed to refund court fee; no merits adjudication; statutes referenced: Order VII Rule 1 CPC, Order IV Rule 1 Original Side Rules.

What did the court decide?

Suit dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court; Registry directed to refund the Court fee applicable as per law; connected Miscellaneous Applications (O.A.No.713 & 714 of 2024) closed. ¶23

N. Baskar Vs T.N.Rangesh — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.S.No.231 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 21.07.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

C.S.No.231 of 2024 & O.A.No.713 & 714 of 2024

N.Baskar

... Plaintiff

vs.

T.N.Rangesh ... Defendant

¶11

Prayer : Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules to pray this Court to pass a Preliminary Judgment and Decree against the defendant:-

¶12

a) for partition of the suit schedule mentioned property, by dividing the same by metes and bounds into two equal half shares and allot one half share in the same to the plaintiff;

¶13

b)for permanent injunction restraining the defendant or his men, agent or servant from alienating, encumbering, leasing out or in any other manner dealing with the suit schedule mentioned property and

¶14

c) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant or his men, agent or servant from altering the physical features of the suit schedule mentioned property till the property is divided by

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.S.No.231 of 2024

¶18

metes and bounds;

¶19

d) directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff the cost of the suit and

¶20

e) to grant such further reliefs as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶21

For Plaintiffs : Mr.H.Manojin For defendants : Mr.B.Manoharan

¶22

When the matter is taken up for hearing, a letter had been circulated indicating that the lis between the parties had been settled out of Court and the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Suit and the same has been acknowledged by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the sole defendant.

¶23

2.Recording the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the Suit is dismissed as withdrawn, as being settled out of Court. Registry is directed to refund the Court fee applicable as per law. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Applications are closed.

¶24

21.07.2025

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.S.No.231 of 2024

¶28

Index : Yes / No Internet :Yes / No Gba

¶29

3/4