Dismissed¶26

Parimila v. S.Rajaperumal

Madras HC5 Jun 2025CRP(MD)/622/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; M.Dhandapani, J.; C.R.P.(MD)No.622 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3440 of 2021; decided 05.06.2025; Parimala and others v. S.Rajaperumal; Article 227; revision dismissed as infructuous; O.S.No.62 of 2011; I.A.No.6 of 2021; set-aside application dismissed; suit for declaration and recovery of possession; ex-parte decree set aside; C.M.A.(MD)No.157 of 2020 allowed; A.S.(MD)No.171 of 2022 dismissed on 31.01.2025; SLP preferred; no costs.

What did the court decide?

In view of the subsequent events — restoration of the suit and its decree after contest in favour of the respondent, dismissal of A.S.(MD)No.171 of 2022 on 31.01.2025, and the SLP preferred by the petitioners — this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. ¶21

Parimila Vs S.Rajaperumal — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.622 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.622 of 2021

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.(MD)No.3440 of 2021

¶9

1.Parimala 2.Angayarkanni 3.Savithri

¶10

4.Shanthi

¶11

5.Murugesen ...Petitioners

¶12

Vs.

¶13

S.Rajaperumal ...Respondent

¶14

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to call for the records pertaining to the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.6 of 2021 in O.S.No.62 of 2011 dated 08.03.2021, on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli and set aside the same by allowing the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.R.P.(MD)No.622 of 2021

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajaraman

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the order in I.A.No.6 of 2021 in O.S.No.62 of 2011 dated 08.03.2021, on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

¶21

2. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.62 of 2011 and he has filed a suit for declaration and recovery of possession and the said suit was decreed ex-parte, against which, the petitioners herein have filed a set-aside petition in I.A.No.6 of 2021 in O.S.No.62 of 2011. The said application came to be dismissed, against which, the petitioners have preferred an appeal before this Court in C.M.A.(MD)No.157 of 2020 and the said Civil Miscellaneous Appeal came to be allowed by this Court. Thereafter, the suit was restored and after contest, the said suit came to be decreed in favour of the respondent. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioners preferred an appeal before this Court in A.S.(MD)No.171 of 2022 and the same was dismissed on 31.01.2025. As against the same, the petitioners preferred SLP. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P.(MD)No.622 of 2021

¶25

¶26

3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as

¶27