Dismissed

Nagarajan v. 1. Deivambal (Dead), 2. Muthiah

Madras HC11 Aug 2025CRP(MD)/2451/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition against a Sub Court, Thuraiyur order in an appeal; counsel sought liberty to obtain certified copies instead. The High Court, without going into merits, permitted filing a certified-copy application and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file an application for certified copies of documents for arguing A.S.No.3 of 2020; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Nagarajan Vs 1. Deivambal (Dead), 2. Muthiah — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No. 2451 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.2451 of 2022

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.(MD)No.11988 of 2022

Nagarajan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.Deivambal (Dead) 2.Muthiah 3.Kasthuri 4.Sureshkumar

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

[Cause title is accepted vide court order dated 25.11.2022 made in C.M.P.(MD)No.11363 of 2022]

¶15

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to pass an order setting aside the order dated 24.06.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in A.S.No.3 of 2020 by the Sub Court, Thuraiyur, thereby allowing the Civil Revision Petition.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶17

C.R.P.(MD)No. 2451 of 2022

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates

¶19

For Respondents 2 to 5 : Mr.H.Lakshmi Sankar

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 24.06.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in A.S.No.3 of 2020 by the Sub Court, Thuraiyur.

¶22

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed the impugned I.A.No.1 of 2021, seeking to call for the records relating to O.S.No.176 of 2004. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays to permit the petitioner to apply for certified copy for securing the documents, enabling the petitioner to argue the case in A.S.No.3 of 2020.

¶23

3. In view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, permits the petitioner to file an appropriate petition seeking certified copy for securing the documents, enabling the petitioner to argue the case in A.S.No.3 of 2020.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶25

C.R.P.(MD)No. 2451 of 2022

¶26

4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed, with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

11.08.2025

¶28

Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No MR

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶30

C.R.P.(MD)No. 2451 of 2022

¶31

¶32

1.The Sub Court, Thuraiyur.

¶33

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶35

C.R.P.(MD)No. 2451 of 2022

¶36

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

¶37

¶38

C.R.P.(MD)No.2451 of 2022

¶39

11.08.2025

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Nagarajan v. 1. Deivambal (Dead), 2. Muthiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagarajan v. 1. Deivambal (Dead), 2. Muthiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Kannappan Vs The Manager and Correspondent

Suruliammal (Died), Muthu Vs murugesan

Karuppaiah Vs M.Subramanian

S.Karupaiah Pillai Vs Vijayalakshmi

D.Murasolimaran Vs The District Collector

Chandrasekar M Vs The Chairman