Execution petition on an arbitral award was ordered against the petitioner, who claimed he was denied a copy of the award and thus could not file a Section 34 appeal. The High Court held an effective alternate remedy existed under Section 34 and dismissed the revision with liberty to pursue that remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD).No.9792 of 2025
V.Murugesan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Radhakrishnan
KVasudeva Maniakkaran (Died on 2302.2020)
2.V.Karunakaran
3.V.Parthiban
4.E.Nivedhitha
5.Madhivadhani
6.Uma Mahewari
7.Anusya ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, dated 18.04.2024 made in E.P.No.89 of 2017 in Arbitration Case No.4 of 2015 on the file of the Sole Arbitrator, Chennai.
1/4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji * * * * *
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking orders to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, dated 18.04.2024 in E.P.No.89 of 2017 in Arbitration Case No. 4 of 2015 on the file of the Sole Arbitrator, Chennai.
2/4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025
view that the petitioner has an effective alternate remedy available under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
03.07.2025
Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No TSG To 1.The Principal District Judge, Trichirappalli.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
TSG
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1792 of 2025
03.07.2025
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision lies when the petitioner claims the arbitral award copy was never furnished, barring his Section 34 appeal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V.Murugesan
S.Radhakrishnan
V.Karunakaran
V.Parthiban
E.Nivedhitha
Madhivadhani
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
