Disposed¶23

A.Saravanan v. R.Seenivasan

Madras HC28 Apr 2025CRP(MD)/1369/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 civil revision petition for time-bound disposal of execution proceedings; E.P.No.18 of 2024 in LA.No.17 of 2023 in O.S.No.145 of 2016, Sub Court, Valliyoor; decree holder/plaintiff A.Saravanan; respondents/defendants R.Seenivasan and Prema Mary Nayagam ex-parte in execution; suit for specific performance of 44 cents settled in Lok Adalat for sale deed of 5 cents; defendants evaded execution of sale deed; draft sale deed returned for boundary amendment; executing Court directed to decide by 31.08.2025; petition disposed of without costs; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice R. Vijayakumar; dated 28.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Executing Court directed to dispose of E.P.No.18 of 2024 on or before 31.08.2025; Civil Revision Petition disposed of with no costs. ¶23

A.Saravanan Vs R.Seenivasan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 28.04.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶5

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1369 of 2025

¶6

A.Saravanan ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶7

¶8

1.R.Seenivasan ...1^st Respondent/NIL in E.P.No.18/2024/ 1^{s t} Defendant in O.S.No.145/2016

¶9

2.Prema Mary Nayagam ...2^nd Respondent/Respondent/2^nd Defendant

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to expedite the execution proceedings pending in E.P.No.18 of 2024 in LA.No.17 of 2023 in O.S.No.145 of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Valliyoor, and to dispose the same within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.K.Vinoharan

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The decree holder in O.S.No.145 of 2016, on the file of the Sub Court, Valliyoor, has filed the present revision petition seeking expeditious disposal of E.P.No.18 of 2024.

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

2.According to the learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner,

¶17

the suit was filed for the relief of specific performance of 44 cents. The matter was referred to Lok Adalat. In Lok Adalat, the plaintiff and the defendants had agreed that the defendants would execute a sale deed to an extent of 5 cents. Since, the defendants had evaded the execution of the sale deed, the plaintiff has filed E.P.No.18 of 2024. The decree holder has also filed a draft sale deed and it has been returned for effecting amendment with regard to the boundaries. At this stage, the present revision petition has been filed.

¶18