Dismissed¶25

Kandasamy, v. Jayanthi

Madras HC16 Jun 2025CRP(MD)/1312/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kandasamy Vs. Jayanthi, Minor Rakul and Jeyakumar; C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1312 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD).No.7572 of 2021; Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; Coram: M.DHANDAPANI, J.; decided 16.06.2025; Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; Article 227 of Constitution of India; impugned order dated 07.04.2021 in I.A.No. 1 of 2020 in A.S.S.R.No.4479 of 2018, District Judge, Karur; appeal disposed of by lower appellate Court; Second Appeal pending; no costs.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous, with no costs, because the underlying appeal in A.S.S.R.No.4479 of 2018 has been disposed of by the lower appellate Court, the petitioner's Second Appeal is pending before this Court, and nothing survives for further adjudication; the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ¶25

Kandasamy, Vs Jayanthi — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1312 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1312 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD).No.7572 of 2021

Kandasamy

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.Jayanthi

2.Minor Rakul (Represented by his mother and guardian)

¶12

3.Jeyakumar

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 07.04.2021 made in I.A.No. 1 of 2020 in A.S.S.R.No.4479 of 2018 on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil

¶16

For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.S.Gokulraj

¶17

¶18

1/3

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1312 of 2021

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This petition has been filed seeking orders to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 07.04.2021 made in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in A.S.S.R.No.4479 of 2018 on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur.

¶23

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of this case, the appeal in A.S.S.R.No.4479 of 2018 has been disposed of by the lower appellate Court and the petitioner herein filed Second Appeal before this Court

¶24

and the same is pending. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.

¶25